On Dec 8, 2008, at 1:37 PM, Jim Devine wrote:
Annual rate of decline in union density by presidential term:
Reagan -3.3% Clinton -2.1% Bush -1.6%
is that Bush II? could it be that union density has hit close to rock bottom, so that even the most anti-union President has a hard time lowering it further?
I'm guessing the UAW will exist mostly in name only pretty soon.
Doug _______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
- Re: [Pen-l] Re: Re: The looming battle over EFCA, (continued)
- Re: [Pen-l] Re: Re: The looming battle over EFCA, Doug Henwood Mon 08 Dec 2008, 17:53 GMT
- [Pen-l] Re: Re: The looming battle over EFCA, Julio Huato Mon 08 Dec 2008, 18:01 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] Re: Re: The looming battle over EFCA, Doug Henwood Mon 08 Dec 2008, 18:08 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] Re: Re: The looming battle over EFCA, Jim Devine Mon 08 Dec 2008, 18:12 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] Re: Re: The looming battle over EFCA, Doug Henwood Mon 08 Dec 2008, 18:23 GMT
- [Pen-l] The UAW takes David Shemano's advice, raghu Mon 08 Dec 2008, 17:21 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] The UAW takes David Shemano's advice, Jim Devine Mon 08 Dec 2008, 17:43 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] The UAW takes David Shemano's advice, raghu Mon 08 Dec 2008, 18:05 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] The UAW takes David Shemano's advice, Jim Devine Mon 08 Dec 2008, 18:09 GMT