On Dec 3, 2008, at 12:46 PM, Jim Devine wrote:
Right. That's an important reason why there should not be a single-minded focus on any single "progress" indicator -- and why citizens need as much information of all sorts as possible. More importantly, however, we need more democratic controls over elected officials, for example, the right to recall them in mid-term (making them our delegates rather than our representatives). These delegates should also be denied any special privileges, perks, or pay that create the incentive to cling to office.
Doug _______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
- Re: [Pen-l] Behavioral economics, (continued)
- Re: [Pen-l] Behavioral economics, Max Sawicky Wed 03 Dec 2008, 20:52 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] Behavioral economics, Jim Devine Wed 03 Dec 2008, 21:06 GMT
- [Pen-l] Green Public investment, McDonough, Terrence Wed 03 Dec 2008, 16:22 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] Green Public investment, Jim Devine Wed 03 Dec 2008, 17:22 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] Green Public investment, Doug Henwood Wed 03 Dec 2008, 17:28 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] Green Public investment, Michael Perelman Wed 03 Dec 2008, 19:49 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] Green Public investment, Jim Devine Wed 03 Dec 2008, 19:59 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- RE: Re: [Pen-l] Green Public investment, David B. Shemano Wed 03 Dec 2008, 23:17 GMT
- Re: Re: [Pen-l] Green Public investment, Jim Devine Wed 03 Dec 2008, 23:27 GMT