PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[Pen-l] Chinese stability
This sort of sees a similar possibility as Jim D. does in the US finance crisis causing the fall of the CP in China maybe.
Wadi'h Halabi writes in Political Affairs:
[...] Today, the growth of economies formed by workers' revolutions,
particularly China, tends to introduce some stability into the world
economy. China's potential stabilizing role is why I am still reluctant
to call the present crisis a "general crisis" of disproportionality,
although it could rapidly turn into one if the dollar collapses,
bringing down world trade with it, or if China falls to
counterrevolution, as with the USSR and eleven other states under
similar pressures in the 1980s. Although counterrevolution is by no
means inevitable, both domestic and international measures are necessary
to avoid it. Cuba survived such attempts in the 1980s - thanks in large
part to internal strengths, but it is once again coming under immense
pressure.
To understand this point more fully, contrast China to Mexico, one of
the United States' largest trading partners. Per capita, Mexico's trade
with the US is far higher than China's. US exports to Mexico by the end
of 2008 were about double total US exports to China, according to US
government data. So why isn't Mexico significant as a stabilizing force
on the US economy (and indirectly, the world)?
The fundamental difference between China and Mexico is that the former
is a product of socialist revolution and so has some control over its
economy, while Mexico's socialist revolution is still ahead of it.
Capitalism's "control" in Mexico is only over distribution of pain in a
crisis it cannot control.
Mexico has suffered at least three devastating crises over the past 30
years, major damage to its basic industrial capacity. Real wages today
are significantly lower than they were 30 years ago, in part due to
sharp currency devaluations. A big part of Mexico's imports are for
processing and re-export to the US, adding to problems with
"overproduction" and "overcapacity," i.e. disproportionality. It may be
about to suffer even more than it has in recent decades. Already,
Mexico's currency has depreciated sharply in recent weeks, effectively
cutting wages and the standard of living.
By contrast, China has now gone over 40 years without a downturn, and 30
years averaging 9.8 percent annual growth; real hourly workers' wages
have been rising at least nine percent a year for over a decade. The net
effect is that China's economic activity as a whole tends toward
stability while Mexico's (and other capitalist countries) tends to
cyclical crisis and instability.
For all of the talk about China's exports (which are smaller than
Germany's, even though China's population is fifteen times larger),
China's imports are intended primarily to serve domestic needs. Directly
or indirectly, China has accounted for some 30 percent of the growth in
the world economy in recent years, possibly more. China's purchases from
Japan, Thailand, Indonesia, South Korea, etc. not only have helped keep
those economies from freezing up, e.g. in the face of the crisis of
1997, but have also allowed them to continue purchasing from the US -
and to service their massive debts, which can be traced back (sometimes
indirectly) to Wall Street.
While China's economic strength has so far resisted the global downturn,
it hasn't been free of problems and vulnerabilities. This is
attributable to the fact that China still exists within a world
capitalist system on which it depends for investment, resources and
trade. Growth of China's industrial production has slowed from a rate of
20 percent at the end of 2007 and 14 percent this past summer to eight
percent currently. Further decline of the dollar and instability in
currencies will affect China's ability to sustain internal investment.
To offset this, China is considering abandoning the dollar as a major
currency reserve.
The stabilizing tendency of China's economic power indicates the
relative strength of the working class. The key question now is how this
strength will be used. Will it strengthen workers' power, or attempt to
maintain an unsustainable status quo? One positive sign of the direction
China is going can be found in the different responses to the global
crisis by the US and Chinese governments. While the Bush administration
poured $700 billion into propping up banks, China has pledged almost
$600 billion for affordable housing and necessary infrastructure. [...]
Full at:
http://www.politicalaffairs.net/article/view/7778/1/355/
This message has been scanned for malware by SurfControl plc. www.surfcontrol.com
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]