Schumpeter, I think, was was also quite clear on the historical specificity of eras of capitalism when he wrote that the society that emerges at the end of a long wave is totally unlike the society that existed at the beginning of the long wave and it is not simply a quantitative matter - "add as many coaches as you want, you will never get a railroad" - but a qualitative matter.
What Wallerstein is arguing is that there are structural features of the current version of capitalism that don't lend themselves to the kind of transitions that have previously characterized capitalism. You can disagree with that argument. But simply pointing to precedent doesn't respond to the claim that the current situation is unprecedented.
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 8:53 AM, Jim Devine <jdevine03@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
it's the end of capitalism as we know it! But since
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 8:39 AM, Carl Dassbach <dassbach@xxxxxxx> wrote:
This is a crisis of regulation (ala Aglietta). A new mode of regulation. for sustaining the extended reproduction of Capital is one possible consequence. Obviously, there are others but I personally doubt we will see the end of the capitalism (as a political economy). Wallerstein has been predicting the "end" for too long to be taken seriously. If you are always predicting the "end," sometimes it will appear as though you are correct. Concentrated and directed pressure towards what????
Jim Devine wrote:
ken hanly wrote:
The new system will be the results of an infinity of individual pressures. What sort of nonsense is that. I do not see any evidence that the present crisis is leading to a new system that is not capitalist. At most it will lead to some changes in existing capitalism involving regulation of financial markets globally if possible and more government involvement as a means of bailing out or hospitalizing ailing parts of the system until they recover and handed back to private profiteers.
There certainly seems no difference in the US political system. Everything is framed in terms of the two capitalist parties and the same illusions are sold about change and the same bipartisan imperialist foreign policy espoused by both parties.<
Right. Instead of an "an infinity of individual pressures," what's needed is concentrated collective pressure.
_______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
-- Jim Devine / "Nobody told me there'd be days like these / Strange days indeed -- most peculiar, mama." -- JL. _______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
_______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
- Re: [Pen-l] The Depression: A Long-Term View, (continued)
- Re: [Pen-l] The Depression: A Long-Term View, Jim Devine Sun 02 Nov 2008, 15:27 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] The Depression: A Long-Term View, Carl Dassbach Sun 02 Nov 2008, 16:17 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] The Depression: A Long-Term View, Jim Devine Sun 02 Nov 2008, 16:31 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] The Depression: A Long-Term View, Sandwichman Sun 02 Nov 2008, 16:37 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] The Depression: A Long-Term View, Carl Dassbach Sun 02 Nov 2008, 17:08 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] The Depression: A Long-Term View, Doyle Saylor Sun 02 Nov 2008, 17:14 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] The Depression: A Long-Term View, Sandwichman Sun 02 Nov 2008, 19:13 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] The Depression: A Long-Term View, Carrol Cox Sun 02 Nov 2008, 19:27 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] The Depression: A Long-Term View, Jim Devine Sun 02 Nov 2008, 19:43 GMT