PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]

Date: [ Previous | Next ] Thread: [ Previous | Next ] Index: [ Author | Date | Thread ]

RE: [Pen-l] The fundamental crisis response. was Ecologicalcreditcrunch

To: "Progressive Economics" <pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Pen-l] The fundamental crisis response. was Ecologicalcreditcrunch
From: "Perelman, Michael" <MPerelman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 17:46:17 -0700
Thread-index: Ack676lEgaNZiKFMTLuET+N6620zAQAAgrnA
Thread-topic: [Pen-l] The fundamental crisis response. was Ecologicalcreditcrunch

I am with Max.  We want better, not more growth.  Better growth need not conflict with environmental sanity.


Michael Perelman

_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

References:
- [Pen-l] Ecological credit crunch
  - From: Louis Proyect
- [Pen-l] The fundamental crisis response. was Ecological credit crunch
  - From: Eugene Coyle
- Re: [Pen-l] The fundamental crisis response. was Ecological credit crunch
  - From: raghu
- Re: [Pen-l] The fundamental crisis response. was Ecological creditcrunch
  - From: Carrol Cox

Prev by Date: Re: [Pen-l] The fundamental crisis response. was Ecological creditcrunch
Next by Date: Re: [Pen-l] The fundamental crisis response. was Ecological creditcrunch
Previous by thread: Re: [Pen-l] The fundamental crisis response. was Ecological creditcrunch
Next by thread: Re: [Pen-l] The fundamental crisis response. was Ecological creditcrunch
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- [Pen-l] RE: Marxist Pres. Nationalize petrochemical companies?, (continued)

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]