On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 11:14 AM, Eugene Coyle <eugenecoyle@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Robert Frank, from Cornell, wrote a popular book that sold well, Luxury
> Fever. In it he deplored rampant consumerism and also attacked the exisitng
> income distribution. He ended lamely by suggesting higher taxes on the rich
> as a remedy for both, but remarked that such wouldn't pass Congress. He
> didn't touch growth or worktime as the solution.
> Economists won't touch the growth subject. Why won't PEN-L?
Exactly, why won't PEN-L? From last week's thread on Volcker's
"standards of living have to decline", I get the impression that there
is little sympathy on PEN-L for the no growth idea.
-raghu.
--
Confucius say, dirty book rarely dusty.
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
_______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
- [Pen-l] great title!, Jim Devine Wed 29 Oct 2008, 12:53 GMT
- [Pen-l] Ecological credit crunch, Louis Proyect Wed 29 Oct 2008, 12:44 GMT
- [Pen-l] The fundamental crisis response. was Ecological credit crunch, Eugene Coyle Thu 30 Oct 2008, 17:52 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] The fundamental crisis response. was Ecological credit crunch, raghu Thu 30 Oct 2008, 19:39 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] The fundamental crisis response. was Ecological credit crunch, Max Sawicky Thu 30 Oct 2008, 20:17 GMT
- RE: [Pen-l] The fundamental crisis response. was Ecological credit crunch, Peter Hollings Thu 30 Oct 2008, 20:44 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] The fundamental crisis response. was Ecological credit crunch, raghu Fri 31 Oct 2008, 00:52 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] The fundamental crisis response. was Ecological credit crunch, Jim Devine Fri 31 Oct 2008, 01:39 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] The fundamental crisis response. was Ecological credit crunch, raghu Fri 31 Oct 2008, 02:32 GMT