|
Ted Winslow writes:
"Keynes' analysis is based on ontological and anthropological foundations different from Austrian foundations. As he himself points out in the case of Hayek, this goes unnoticed by Austrian readers of Keynes."
Well, since Keynes pointed out the issue over 60 years ago, is it your position that every Austrian who subsequently read Keynes also failed to notice the different ontological and anthropological foundations?
David Shemano
|
_______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
- RE: Re: [Pen-l] a dialogue, (continued)
- RE: Re: [Pen-l] a dialogue, David B. Shemano Thu 30 Oct 2008, 17:20 GMT
- Re: Re: [Pen-l] a dialogue, Jim Devine Thu 30 Oct 2008, 19:50 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] a dialogue, Shane Mage Thu 30 Oct 2008, 20:11 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] a dialogue, ravi Thu 30 Oct 2008, 21:10 GMT
- RE: Re: [Pen-l] a dialogue, David B. Shemano Thu 30 Oct 2008, 17:47 GMT
- FW: [Pen-l] a dialogue, Peter Hollings Thu 30 Oct 2008, 19:44 GMT
- Re: FW: [Pen-l] a dialogue, Jim Devine Thu 30 Oct 2008, 19:51 GMT
- RE: Re: Re: [Pen-l] a dialogue, David B. Shemano Thu 30 Oct 2008, 21:30 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: [Pen-l] a dialogue, Jim Devine Thu 30 Oct 2008, 21:42 GMT