Re: [Pen-l] Neo-classical crises

To: Progressive Economics <pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Pen-l] Neo-classical crises
From: Doyle Saylor <doylesaylor@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 08:33:53 -0700

Greetings Economists, Ha ha Troll indeed. This response by Quiggin is a good example of how little these sorts of tools do to really utilize the media for more democratic purposes. A good reason to admire Michael Perelman's efforts on Pen-L. thanks, Doyle Saylor On Oct 30, 2008, at 8:26 AM, Louis Proyect wrote:

o everyone else, please don’t feed the trolls by responding further to pro-Milosevic apologists – the answers already given are adequate.


_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

References:
- [Pen-l] Neo-classical crises
  - From: Max Sawicky
- Re: [Pen-l] Neo-classical crises
  - From: Louis Proyect

Prev by Date: Re: [Pen-l] Neo-classical crises
Next by Date: [Pen-l] Re: Neo-classical crises
Previous by thread: Re: [Pen-l] Neo-classical crises
Next by thread: [Pen-l] Re: Neo-classical crises
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- Re: [Pen-l] Pollin?, (continued)
  - Re: [Pen-l] Pollin?, Shane Taylor Fri 31 Oct 2008, 01:17 GMT
- [Pen-l] Neo-classical crises, Max Sawicky Thu 30 Oct 2008, 14:57 GMT
  - Re: [Pen-l] Neo-classical crises, Louis Proyect Thu 30 Oct 2008, 15:04 GMT
    - Re: [Pen-l] Neo-classical crises, Doyle Saylor Thu 30 Oct 2008, 15:11 GMT
  - [Pen-l] Re: Neo-classical crises, Michael Nuwer Thu 30 Oct 2008, 15:12 GMT
  - Re: [Pen-l] Neo-classical crises, Jim Devine Thu 30 Oct 2008, 15:18 GMT
    - Re: [Pen-l] Neo-classical crises, Sandwichman Thu 30 Oct 2008, 16:49 GMT
  - Re: [Pen-l] Neo-classical crises, Doyle Saylor Thu 30 Oct 2008, 16:11 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]