PEN-L
mailing list archive

Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]

Date:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Thread:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Index:  [ Author  | Date  | Thread  ]

Re: [Pen-l] decoupling



I wonder if it is "decoupling" and not "buffering"?  It is anybody's guess how large the Chinese private sector is since the cross-holding of equity by state firms is of byzantinian proportion.

Anthony
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Anthony P. D'Costa
Professor of Indian Studies
Asia Research Centre
Copenhagen Business School
Porcelænshaven 24, 3
DK-2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark
Email:ad.int@cbs.dk
Ph: +45 3815 2572
Fax: +45 3815 2500
http://uk.cbs.dk/arc
http://tinyurl.com/4ujecq
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 2:26 PM, Jim Devine <jdevine03@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
why is it that people assume that China has been successful at
decoupling from the world economy, so that it won't experience
negative growth rates (as opposed to mere slowing growth) as a result
of kapital's kurrent kerfuffle?

also, we know that their central bank has accumulated mucho dinero
norteamericano (i.e., US$), but to what extent has the  Chinese
private sector borrowed from US$ lenders and are so affected by the
credit cut-off?

--
Jim Devine /  "Nobody told me there'd be days like these / Strange
days indeed -- most peculiar, mama." -- JL.
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l



--

_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l


Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]