PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: [Pen-l] Seems to me
- To: dassbach@xxxxxxx, "Progressive Economics" <pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Pen-l] Seems to me
- From: "Jim Devine" <jdevine03@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 11:04:09 -0700
- Cc:
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=ZfeS29wWNvxX+hY1ObRW/gaqAkxGj0JjuqonutwS7NA=; b=x2QA/7MM6Ip/heSCEqqN8V+qqmiM0qBj6wpcElqUquHuy0o9vebczNuNO239wXQil3 iDOoOkX00TOqw8rmqAKWqT8Gl9TIJgkVS6jN3H87CABntg9XU11gcNsraVh9+GtGXJYL rgDjkrjIPUWAeOJ1Xphnpl5HMIWVOANx3eLyg=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=KjMi/KQsCwqNpbRgtwZIFjPyoqS4WPgoEHoc2Yq3TnnjqIsjvMFpkV0ADz4brdggkO Q1LUptveGz/B+nejsNsUXUr1HOcYGyXhkIYJsn+LS+SUSKTNv6qxyl2mrmzwIcPNgNN8 cYkBILuRWzcsfl/1TwQpoXilcpnxl2C3a5Jmo=
Carl Dassbach wrote:
> Question - how does the lack of personal savings in the US (as far as I know
> the US has the lowest rate of personal savings, less than zero, or seen
> another way, Americans spend 103% of their income) figure in the current
> crisis?
the low US saving rates has two sources, as far as I can see:
1) for working people, stagnant real incomes (especially if we use a
better, non-Boskinized measure of consumer prices) and increasingly
pressing needs pushed a lot of people to cut back on their saving --
and to increase their borrowing. This was facilitated by institutions
of easy credit, including "home equity loans" (i.e., 2nd mortgages)
based on inflated house prices.
(One way to look at this is that stagnant mass consumption is the
result of the recent neoliberal phase of US capitalist development. It
is then made up for by another side-effect of that phase:
_laissez-faire finance_.)
2) for richer folks, rising stock prices (especially in the 1990s) and
house prices (especially in the 2000s) were treated as a substitute
for saving part of income. This also got them into borrowing,
including leveraging financial investments (and low-cash-up-front home
loans). Here, borrowing was based on inflated asset prices rather than
on stagnant incomes.
Low domestic private-sector saving and high borrowing was allowed by
capital inflow, loaning (and equity purchases) from outside the US.
With the end of the housing and stock market bubbles, all of this
accumulation of debt is spelling gigantic trouble. Falling house
prices, unsold houses, foreclosures, bankruptcies, and the like are
all encouraging a steep and likely long recession.
The fact that the US external debt has ballooned is compensated for by
the facts that (1) those debts can be paid with US dollars and (2) a
lot of the toxic assets (based on bad mortgages) are held overseas.
--
Jim Devine / "Nobody told me there'd be days like these / Strange
days indeed -- most peculiar, mama." -- JL.
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]