Re: [Pen-l] Sarah Palin lowered the standards for female

To: Progressive Economics <pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Pen-l] Sarah Palin lowered the standards for female
From: Doug Henwood <dhenwood@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 13:31:09 -0400

Hey, Charles, it's not working. Palin's a dud, at least in the polls. She's energized the base, but has won over no one, and is widely viewed as not qualified.

Doug
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

References:
- [Pen-l] Sarah Palin lowered the standards for female
  - From: Charles Brown

Prev by Date: [Pen-l] Sarah Palin lowered the standards for female
Next by Date: Re: [Pen-l] Community Reinvestment Act at fault -- NOT
Previous by thread: [Pen-l] Sarah Palin lowered the standards for female
Next by thread: Re: [Pen-l] Sarah Palin lowered the standards for female
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- [Pen-l] stock buy backs, Perelman, Michael Thu 09 Oct 2008, 00:04 GMT
  - Re: [Pen-l] stock buy backs, Shane Mage Thu 09 Oct 2008, 01:20 GMT
- [Pen-l] Chinese perspectives, Chris Burford Wed 08 Oct 2008, 20:03 GMT
- [Pen-l] Sarah Palin lowered the standards for female, Charles Brown Wed 08 Oct 2008, 16:57 GMT
  - Re: [Pen-l] Sarah Palin lowered the standards for female, Doug Henwood Wed 08 Oct 2008, 17:11 GMT
  - Re: [Pen-l] Sarah Palin lowered the standards for female, ravi Wed 08 Oct 2008, 18:04 GMT
    - Re: [Pen-l] Sarah Palin lowered the standards for female, Jeffrey Fisher Wed 08 Oct 2008, 18:25 GMT
      
      Re: [Pen-l] Sarah Palin lowered the standards for female, Jim Devine Wed 08 Oct 2008, 19:10 GMT
      
      Re: Re: [Pen-l] Sarah Palin lowered the standards for female, sawicky Wed 08 Oct 2008, 19:23 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]