PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: [Pen-l] China and the world distribution of income
- To: "Progressive Economics" <pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Pen-l] China and the world distribution of income
- From: "Anthony D'Costa" <promothesdcosta@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 14:50:49 +0200
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=DOOSM/zRR+XuwQqwLZQyCe+dWh4LJ+eDbRn3iYrersg=; b=vjJyv/0l1TjOr1150Tkiey88RmXBAElZJjgdzJwlTyzA+6IADFnBixuRSL6Gtg8mZ9 4nA8O4u7bieKhU5hHIHK2tduo3h0x8S0tWkzOp7H1f1HS2gAj8fBqhd0u/QU0nNHzxoO 0sLwl/1nyvZBLHZx+G2O/GaeapN6qjSZOVeqA=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=imsP31T/Jr3I2jXjZFy+VAFrVOLhPajGPGtLjcytb7u5qWCT/C0ZOogzpRchKAX+M+ zbl7ZnAaps74z+fIWk7s0gvCDSkUXauvpnn8VW1gNxFyHHhHu0AZ+t7L2tuSZ+EvyKen vTQxTt8Hpt5j8U8YWOJR8m2x7P1Ki5+4kPjdI=
Marty's book is selling in India! Congrats! It is being marketed,
however, to non-Indian readers abroad.
55. Hart-Landsberg, Martin,
Critical Perspectives on China's Economic Transformation / Martin
Hart-Landsberg and Paul Burkett, introduction by Hari P. Sharma.
Delhi, Daanish Books. 2007.
A "Critical Asian Studies" Roundtable on the Book China and Socialism.
List Price: $ 17.50 (Ubd.) Your Price: $ 15.80 (Ubd.)
ISBN: 8189654351 KK-62032
Cheers, Anthony
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 5:46 PM, Martin Hart-Landsberg <marty@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Anthony--
>
> China's leadership in the East Asian inequality olympics is earned through
> competition with all 22 East Asian developing countries that are members of
> the Asian Development Bank. It just so happens that Nepal is China's
> toughest competitor. India is just in the middle of the pack--better luck
> next year. For more see
>
> http://www.adb.org/Documents/Books/Key_Indicators/2007/pdf/Inequality-in-Asia-Highlights.pdf
>
> Marty
>
> Anthony D'Costa wrote:
>
> This is interesting. How Nepal is in East Asia beats me! Should
> Nepal be the comparator? How does ADB's stats for China compare with
> India's, perhaps a better comparator?
>
> Cheers, Anthony
>
> PS: How's life Marty?
>
> xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Anthony P. D'Costa
> Professor of Indian Studies
> Asia Research Centre
> Copenhagen Business School
> Porcelaenshaven 24, 3
> DK-2000 Frederiksberg
> Denmark
> Email:ad.int@xxxxxx
> Ph: +45 3815 2572
> Fax: +45 3815 2500
> xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 5:30 AM, Martin Hart-Landsberg <marty@xxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>
> This is not a precise answer to your question but:
>
>
> The Asian Development Bank has the following to say about inequality in
> China: "In the case of the People's Republic of China, unevenness in growth
> across provinces has been found to be an important contributor to increases
> in inequality in the early to mid-1990s. However, perhaps the largest
> contributor to increases in inequality from the mid-1980s to the 2004, have
> been differentials in incomes across rural and urban households. At the same
> time, uneven growth in incomes among urban households has also become a
> prominent source of the more recent increases in inequality."
>
>
>
> More specifically, in a study of inequality covering 22 East Asian
> developing countries, the Asian Development Bank concluded, using the Gini
> coefficient as its measure, that China had become the region's second most
> unequal country, trailing only Nepal. This is not surprising considering
> that the Asian Development Bank found that over a roughly 10-year period
> (from the early 1990s to the early 2000s), China recorded the region's
> second highest increase in inequality, again trailing only Nepal. Using
> other measures of inequality, such as the earnings of the top 20 percent
> relative to the bottom 20 percent of the population, China recorded the
> greatest growth in inequality.
>
> Marty Hart-Landsberg
>
>
> Michael Perelman wrote:
>
> If we were to look at the population of the previously poor in China --
> given some arbitrary definition of poor -- some moved up into the middle
> class and even further and some lost considerable ground -- an
> unintentional pun considering the land grabs that are common. Has anybody
> tried to quantify this?
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pen-l mailing list
> pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
>
>
>
>
> --
> _______________________________________________
> pen-l mailing list
> pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pen-l mailing list
> pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
>
>
--
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Anthony P. D'Costa
Professor of Indian Studies
Asia Research Centre
Copenhagen Business School
Porcelaenshaven 24, 3
DK-2000 Frederiksberg
Denmark
Email:ad.int@xxxxxx
Ph: +45 3815 2572
Fax: +45 3815 2500
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]