PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: [Pen-l] On Eurocentrism
- To: "Progressive Economics" <pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Pen-l] On Eurocentrism
- From: "Jim Devine" <jdevine03@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 11:23:02 -0700
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=vkplP2u25BEvLKgiGkD9qAxejD59RkseBkuZ7CD6l9U=; b=Y9kPCwiRzRvtjqYDHtZARZ/06ijaC7a4HZaDpy1LED+LVuYnvrW9ThHlwlBgNYtdzv XUP4q1CVjhCJ0c15/CpojJ9CmNULZFh2JEsBokMDMK4rLSyNJOeuGUUmWqz782tEiwtt K7jqADOC1jPtZSLJNOVSr1MBa9QFwgfCWKIkw=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=BXE26E4mglxlJW2xp5iWUdbVYkrDowU5XQjUd8m5amHLLHZugDoX/JVjiP/daxeAyg WyUuch4f9ClUnFqhimlla0HBks7ZUe3Fu+/AYIDkxfrjaVMszvHDzpta50PKvAd8SOv6 7N/uHvqDFxF1Za6PbjwtBok7gDP1jJ5YreIBM=
By these standards, Brenner isn't Eurocentric at all. But then again,
definitions are arbitrary. Bagchi combines the concepts of
Eurocentrism and pro-capitalism.
> From chapter 2 of "Perilous Passage: Mankind and the Global Ascendancy of
> Capital" by Amiya Kumar Bagchi (a review of this book by Immanuel
> Wallerstein is scheduled to appear in an upcoming MR.)
>
> As we have seen, the Eurocentric historians portray the record of Europe's
> internal ascent and its outdistancing of the rest of the world as a much
> more ancient history than it actually is. There is little evidence that
> European records of human survival, health, consumption, or incomes were in
> advance of major Asian countries before the nineteenth century. Most of the
> advances in the crude indicators of human development were registered in
> Europe only from the late eighteenth century. Even in England, the homeland
> of the first industrial revolution, the changeover to factory methods was
> not attended immediately with an improvement in consumption and nutrition of
> the ordinary people. The grandiose invocation of a "consumer revolution" in
> eighteenth-century England by McKendrick has not stood up to serious
> empirical scrutiny. As far as ordinary men, women, and children working in
> the fields, factories, and mines were concerned, the Industrial Revolution
> turned out to be an "industrious revolution" (to use a characterization of
> De Vries 1993, pp. 117-18). The industriousness was induced by poverty as
> well as the prospect of making a living by producing goods for the expanding
> market. The greater industriousness of workers was in many instances
> associated with worse states of nutrition, poorer physique, and shorter
> lives. In the phase of domination of merchant capital and so-called
> protoindustrialization, this also involved more work by women and children
> working under a putting-out system.
etc.
--
Jim Devine / "Segui il tuo corso, e lascia dir le genti." (Go your own
way and let people talk.) -- Karl, paraphrasing Dante.
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]