|
“Front running” Against Humanity in the Oil
Markets By Stephen
Zarlenga, Director, American Monetary Institute “Front-Running is
an insiders’
term for an often illegal, always immoral practice in commodity and
other markets.
Here’s what happens: A broker holding a
client’s order
to buy at a certain price, instead buys for himself just in “front” of
it. The
clients order isn’t filled and the broker has an unfair advantage over
other traders
because he controls the client’s order which will buy the position back
from
him and protect his trade from a loss. The client loses
the
opportunity to gain, where his order is never filled if the market
moves away
from his order point. If some participants can trade with little or no
risk,
over time everyone else is hurt. Because Exchange
Members’
margin requirements are only about 1%, the front running brokers have a
possibility of great gain quickly with almost no risk of loss. Why is
this important to “public policy?” “Front running” is
one way to
view what criminal Enron executives did to Enron was bad
enough, and
Sarbanes-Oxley was passed to hold corporate officers criminally liable
- a good
law as judged by the corporate types screaming for its repeal. But
apparently
it didn’t go far enough as judged by the present bold attack against
humanity
taking place. The manipulation of
energy
markets has widened from cheating the people of We’ve seen the
devastating
effects oil prices have had on airlines; trucking; food delivery and
production; on average families trying to keep up with living costs; on
restaurants and hotels Americans can no longer afford. Add your
examples. It’s
the speculation and hoarding that does it. Exxon couldn’t grab 12
$billion
record 2nd quarter profits if their costs of obtaining oil
were
rising. And so I put aside
an outline
for this paper when it appeared Congress would do its job – rescue the world economy from this pernicious vandalism,
by limiting speculation in oil futures to a few contracts per account. That’s
all it would take to stop the nonsense. There’s no reason
to allow
speculators to position themselves between the world’s limited oil
supplies,
and those who have to use that oil to keep the world economy
functioning. Such speculation
leads directly to hardship, starvation, death and warfare. “Congress
will finally
fulfill its responsibility to act.” I thought, but the measure failed
in the
Senate with 50 for, 43 against, and 7 not voting! Why
didn’t Congress act? If this scenario is
so clear
and harsh, how could the Senate refuse to act? Are they a gang of
demons?” No,
but something potentially worse – we’re confronted with a bad idea that
many
people believe in – the sanctity of markets! The vote exposes a
faulty
methodology - an ideology based on false axioms; a false view of
markets that’s
been strongly promoted, not questioned; with its negative effects not
understood; that view gives markets a sacred character: Don’t try to
legislate against
what the market does – market forces will crush your laws. (its
omnipotent!) Don’t try to
instruct market behavior;
it has inputs from millions of participants and knows more than your
regulators
ever could! (Its Omniscient.) Do the right things
and the
market will reward you; misbehave and you will be punished! (Its
benevolent.) Well, omnipotence,
omniscience and benevolence are attributes of a god,
and Senators don’t often
fight with god! What’s
sorely missing from these
beliefs and assumptions is evidence! Where’s the evidence
that removing regulation from the airline industry had good effects? Where’s the evidence
that removing FCC restrictions on media ownership had good effects? Where’s the evidence
that removing government regulation from any industry has had good
effects? Of course it’s
worse than that.
It goes beyond a lack of evidence because there’s plenty of evidence to
the
contrary! Holding those beliefs requires ignoring
loads of evidence: ignoring
the damage done to the airlines by deregulation; the damage done by
media
concentration; the continuing damage
done to How can proponents
of
unregulated markets justify ignoring the facts? Its crazy, but it’s
also a necessary
part of their false methodology which loves theory but avoids
experience – the
facts. One of their leading “lights.” economist Ludwig Von Mises,
carries it to
extreme levels actually claiming that facts cannot disprove his
theories! So we
are dealing with momentous errors of judgment and methodology. Though these men
are in the U.S.
Senate, they are thinking like scared children. But such errors belong
in
children’s sand boxes, not our nation’s halls of power. This battle over
methodology
is an old fight. We even see it in our nation’s beginnings. Ben Franklin’s 1729 essay “The Nature and
Necessity of a Paper Currency”
gave the correct methodology when he summarized the ideas used to help “Experience, more prevalent than all the
logic in the world has fully convinced us all that paper money has been
of the
greatest benefit to the country.” Maybe as some
Senators voted
against stopping oil speculation, perhaps a more human inner voice
rebelled
against what they did. Was that voice stifled by an unholy combination
of greed
& selfishness, assuaged by their comforting though unsupported
belief in
the utility
of unbridled selfishness and greed? The false notion that selfishness
“works?” The Senators are
not demonic,
but their ideology, summarized as “Market worship,” which ignores the
human
part of the resulting tragedies, certainly is. http://www.monetary.org/frontrunninghumanity.html Stephen Zarlenga, |
Attachment:
cd Frontrunning humanity.doc
Description: MS-Word document
_______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
- [Pen-l] The Exclusion of Labor, cont., Michael Perelman Fri 15 Aug 2008, 04:08 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] The Exclusion of Labor, cont., Carrol Cox Fri 15 Aug 2008, 12:54 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] The Exclusion of Labor, cont., Jim Devine Fri 15 Aug 2008, 19:42 GMT
- [Pen-l] Essay on frontrunning against humanity, AMI Fri 15 Aug 2008, 01:59 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- [Pen-l] Essay on frontrunning against humanity, AMI Sat 16 Aug 2008, 14:12 GMT
- [Pen-l] Essay on frontrunning against humanity, AMI Sat 16 Aug 2008, 14:13 GMT
- [Pen-l] Chinese clean-up helps spur US inflation, Jim Devine Thu 14 Aug 2008, 17:07 GMT
- [Pen-l] India's BoP:The worrisome imbalance, joglekarulhas Thu 14 Aug 2008, 14:18 GMT
- [Pen-l] US Informal Economics report, mckenna193 Wed 13 Aug 2008, 23:26 GMT