PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[Pen-l] MBA's running hospitals?
Marc Bousquet compared the American university today to HMO's. Here's
more evidence of how "non-profit" institutions are adopting the
business model of the for-profit corporation.
No Wonder Our Hospitals Are a Disaster -- People with Marketing
Degrees Are Running Them
By Maggie Mahar, Health Beat
Posted on August 15, 2008, Printed on August 16, 2008
http://www.alternet.org/story/94797/
This article originally appeared on Health Beat.
In 1970, a Fortune magazine cover story warned the nation: "Much of
U.S. medical care, particularly the everyday business of preventing
and treating routine illnesses, is inferior in quality, wastefully
dispensed, and inequitably financed." That year, a Fortune editorial
declared: "The time has come for radical change. ... The management
of medical care is too important to leave to doctors who are, after
all, not managers to begin with."
This was the beginning of the revolution Paul Starr described in his
Pulitzer prize-winning 1982 book, The Social Transformation of
American Medicine. In his final chapter, "The Coming of the
Corporation," Starr expressed his concern that "those who talked
about 'health care planning' in the 1970s now talk about 'health care
marketing.' Everywhere one sees the growth of a kind of marketing
mentality in health care. And, indeed, business school graduates are
displacing graduates of public health schools, hospital
administrators and even doctors in the top echelons of medical care
organizations.
"The organizational culture of medicine used to be dominated by the
ideals of professionalism and voluntarism which softened the
underlying acquisitive activity," Starr wrote. "The restraints
exercised by those ideals now grow weaker. The 'health center' of one
era is the 'profit center' of the next."
In this brave new world of the 1980s, corporate executives would
become both the wealthiest and the most powerful actors on the new
cultural stage. Hospital CEOs would haul home salaries that made
neurosurgeons look like pikers. In health care, as in other
industries, CEOs, not physicians, make the decisions, and their goal,
Starr suggested, would no longer be better health, but rather, "the
rate of return on investments."
Earlier in the 20th century, many hospitals were run by physicians.
Today, the vast majority are, as Starr predicted, run by MBAs and
other businessmen. Some CEOs have studied hospital administration.
Some do a fine job. The very best work well with the doctors in their
hospitals.
Rogue CEOs
But today, it is too easy for someone who knows little about medicine
-- and cares less -- to take charge of a hospital. Over at Health
Care Renewal, Dr. Roy Poses offers a striking example:
Add this to our series of failed health care leaders, from the
South Florida Sun-Sentinel:
A top Memorial Regional Hospital administrator caught up in a
fraud investigation in the Virgin Islands resigned this week after
admitting he spent time in a military prison and lied about it.
Rodney E. Miller, 36, who came to the Hollywood hospital less
than a year ago as chief operating officer and a rising star, never
disclosed he spent time in a Navy brig on theft charges, Frank Sacco,
chief executive of the South Broward Hospital District, said
Thursday. Sacco said when he confronted the man he hoped would one
day succeed him, Miller admitted his lie and quit the $370,000 job on
the spot Tuesday.
Details of Miller's past emerged in a series of stories
published this week by the Virgin Islands Daily News that outlined
widespread alleged financial abuses by Miller and others at Schneider
Regional Medical Center in the Virgin Islands. The newspaper, and an
audit by the U.S. Inspector General's Office, found that more than $1
million was improperly diverted to Miller's personal accounts between
2002 and 2007. Also, he received $3.8 million in salary over several
years while patients went without basic needs for a lack of money,
the newspaper reported.
But it was Miller's failure to disclose a "bad conduct"
discharge from the Navy that led to his departure from Memorial
Regional, Sacco said. Miller stole another serviceman's credit cards
in 1995 and went on a spending spree, then concocted an elaborate
scheme to cover his tracks, the Daily News reported. He left the
service in 1996 and his discharge, after appeals, became official in 2000.
The information, including terms of his 10-month prison sentence
and allegations that he submitted fraudulent documents to
investigators, came from Miller's service records, which are public
under federal law. No one from Memorial Regional or an independent
search firm ever verified Miller's service, Sacco said. ...
Miller served as Schneider's chief executive officer for five
years before accepting the job as head of the adult hospital at
Memorial Regional in October. The inspector general's report was
finished two weeks before Miller was hired in Broward, but not
released until Monday.
The audit, conducted jointly by the Inspectors General of the
Virgin Islands and the U.S. Interior Department, details an "alarming
depth of mismanagement" at the hospital by Miller, his top executives
and the board charged with overseeing their operations. Miller
received more than $1.3 million above his contracted pay scale.
Investigators were met with "secrecy and a deliberate
concealment of financial records" that forced them to seek subpoenas,
according to the audit.
In a story in the Miami Herald, CEO Sacco was quoted, "we
thought we had a rising star."
Not exactly.
If this were merely the story of an outlaw CEO somewhere in the
Virgin Islands, I would not be so concerned. But the recent history
of some of the largest U.S. hospital chains offers a rogue's gallery
of top executives, particularly (but not exclusively) at for-profit
hospitals. Time and again these CEOs have been able to make the
numbers Wall Street is looking for only by making them up. To meet
earnings expectations, some medical centers bilked taxpayers by
overcharging Medicare. Others bribed doctors to "put heads on beds."
Still others overcharged insurers and gulled investors. In the most
harrowing instances, health care providers resorted to kidnapping patients.
In one case, a chain of psychiatric hospitals kept its beds full by
setting targets for its hospital executives. They in turn targeted
the patients they needed: adolescents who had sought help from school
counselors, clergy and parole officers for emotional problems.
National Medical Enterprises (NME) paid the counselors, clergymen and
parole officers bounty fees of as much as $2,000 to "recruit"
patients who were then hospitalized, often against their will, until
their insurance ran out. One 17-year-old was pinioned to his bed for
months. His only "mental health problem" -- before he landed in the
hospital -- was that his girlfriend had jilted him and he was
depressed. By 1993, some 130 patients had brought suits against the
NME, and it faced 14 separate federal and state investigations. But
Richard Eamer, the entrepreneurial businessman who founded the chain,
never went to jail. Instead, he walked away with a lump sum of $2.66
million and the promise of retirement payments of more than $500,000 a year.
As for NME itself, an investment banker who was a friend of the
founder took over the business in 1994. He had no hospital
experience, but he knew how to merge and acquire. Before long NME
became the $2 billion Tenet Healthcare Corporation, boasting 116
hospitals in 17 states.
Then, in 2002, came the FBI raid. Ultimately, Tenet would pay the
government $54 million to settle charges that the Redding Medical
Centers had billed Medicare and Medicaid for thousands of cardiac
procedures, including angioplasties and open-heart surgeries that,
according to an FBI affidavit, were in many cases completely
unnecessary. In the affidavit other cardiologists charged that in an
estimated one-quarter of the cases, the hospital's rainmakers were
operating on patients who had no serious heart problems whatsoever.
Some of those patients did not survive. Others were crippled. All
suffered some form of psychological trauma. Tenet admitted no wrongdoing.
Redding had a sterling reputation. In 2002 its cardiac treatment
center received a five-star rating from HealthGrades, the
Colorado-based health care information company, for the fifth year running.
According to the FBI's affidavit, local cardiologists had tried to
raise a red flag at Redding. One said he warned Steve Schmidt, who
was the hospital's chief executive at the time, of a "serious
problem" with unnecessary heart procedures as far back as 1998.
Another physician alerted Schmidt's successor, Hal Chilton, during
the summer of 2001. He quoted Chilton's response: "We have heard
that, but we're not sure how to handle it."
Neither Schmidt nor Chilton were physicians; nor did they have a
degree in public health.
Jeffrey Barbakow, the investment banker CEO who had created the Tenet
chain, did not go to prison. Instead, he left with his pockets
well-lined: $111 million that he had collected when he cashed in his
stock options, plus $1.3 million in severance and another $585,000 in
pro-rated salary for the year when the hospital system went down.
This brings me back to blogger-doctor Poses, who reminds his readers
that he has argued, in the past, for "developing a licensure process
for leaders of health care organizations. Licensing doctors and
health professionals has been going on for a long time. But now
leaders of health care organizations, from hospitals to drug
companies, have as much if not more influence over health care, and
hence the health and safety of patients as do doctors. Yet," Poses
points out, "there are no requirements that leaders of health care
organizations have any particular educational background, knowledge,
commitment to health care values, or, for that matter, that they have
not committed crimes. Given the scope of bad leadership discussed on
Health Care Renewal, maybe a licensing process for health care
executives would at least ensure that they have not served time in
the brig for theft."
This would be an excellent start.
In an article titled "Physician as Hospital Chief Executive Officer"
published in Vascular and Endovascular Surgery earlier this year,
Robert E. Falcone, M.D., and Bhagwan Satiani, M.D., MBA, go a step
further, suggesting that perhaps the management of medical care is so
important that it should be left to doctors -- or at the very least,
they should be involved.
"As the pendulum swings back from lay leader to clinician leader,
there is a strong and appropriate opportunity for physicians to
reinsert themselves into a leadership role," write Falcone and
Satiani, who both hail from the Ohio State University School of
Medicine. "In fact, the time has perhaps never been more appropriate
than today. In a health care system that is complex, troubled, and
challenging, the physician CEO brings a unique set of skills to the
business of medicine. The successful physician leader, however, must
understand the business of medicine as well as or better than he or
she understands the practice of medicine. Training, developing, and
equipping our future physician leaders with the necessary skill sets
will be one of medicine's many challenges as it expands into the 21st century."
Should either an M.D. or a degree in public health be a requirement
for becoming a hospital CEO? Probably not. There are many fine
hospital executives who possess neither degree. But I do think that
all CEOs should be required to work closely with a panel of the
hospital's physicians, focusing on how they can collaborate to
improve patient safety and health. Physicians also should have a say
in how hospitals invest their surpluses: Should they add on to the
new wing and install whirlpool baths in the maternity wards, or put
the money into an infection control program?
And I agree with Poses: Hospital CEOs should be licensed.
Electricians are licensed. Accountants are licensed. Common sense
dictates that someone running a hospital should be required to pass
exams showing that he or she knows something about "management and
administration" and has a solid grounding in what matters to patients
-- how to reduce errors and lift the quality of care.
Maggie Mahar is a fellow at the Century Foundation and the author of
Money-Driven Medicine: The Real Reason Health Care Costs So Much
(Harper/Collins 2006).
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
- Thread context:
- Re: [Pen-l] Reign of terror in Houston, (continued)
- [Pen-l] economy talk,
Jim Devine Sat 16 Aug 2008, 16:05 GMT
- [Pen-l] India not immune to global economic crisis,
Louis Proyect Sat 16 Aug 2008, 13:03 GMT
- [Pen-l] Iraq hopes to finalize China oilfield deal in August,
joglekarulhas Sat 16 Aug 2008, 12:38 GMT
- [Pen-l] MBA's running hospitals?,
Louis Proyect Sat 16 Aug 2008, 12:27 GMT
- [Pen-l] Imperialist mouthpiece dismantled,
Louis Proyect Sat 16 Aug 2008, 12:17 GMT
- [Pen-l] We don't need no education! (was Away with Education!),
Sabri Oncu Sat 16 Aug 2008, 02:54 GMT
- [Pen-l] Away with Education!,
Michael Perelman Sat 16 Aug 2008, 02:30 GMT
- [Pen-l] Vietnam backs peaceful solutions for South Ossetia conflict,
joglekarulhas Sat 16 Aug 2008, 01:50 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]