Re: [Pen-l] The Irrelevance of Workers In Economic Theory

To: Progressive Economics <pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Pen-l] The Irrelevance of Workers In Economic Theory
From: Doyle Saylor <doylesaylor@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 10:12:52 -0700

Greetings Economists, That I think too broad a statement. One can measure, but the results have many unknowns. Those unknowns are not unknowable, but frontiers of knowledge in my view. thanks, Doyle Saylor On Aug 11, 2008, at 10:02 AM, Jim Devine wrote:

strictly speaking, labor (effort) can't be measured at all.


_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Pen-l] The Irrelevance of Workers In Economic Theory
  - From: Jim Devine

References:
- Re: [Pen-l] The Irrelevance of Workers In Economic Theory
  - From: Les Schaffer
- Re: [Pen-l] The Irrelevance of Workers In Economic Theory
  - From: Michael Perelman
- Re: [Pen-l] The Irrelevance of Workers In Economic Theory
  - From: Les Schaffer
- Re: [Pen-l] The Irrelevance of Workers In Economic Theory
  - From: Jim Devine

Prev by Date: Re: [Pen-l] The Irrelevance of Workers In Economic Theory
Next by Date: Re: [Pen-l] Re: hegemony
Previous by thread: Re: [Pen-l] The Irrelevance of Workers In Economic Theory
Next by thread: Re: [Pen-l] The Irrelevance of Workers In Economic Theory
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- Re: [Pen-l] The Irrelevance of Workers In Economic Theory, (continued)
  - Re: [Pen-l] The Irrelevance of Workers In Economic Theory, fmoseley Mon 11 Aug 2008, 01:42 GMT
    - RE: [Pen-l] The Irrelevance of Workers In Economic Theory, Perelman, Michael Mon 11 Aug 2008, 02:04 GMT
      
      RE: [Pen-l] The Irrelevance of Workers In Economic Theory, fmoseley Mon 11 Aug 2008, 02:33 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]