PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: [Pen-l] The Irrelevance of Workers In Economic Theory
- To: Progressive Economics <pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Pen-l] The Irrelevance of Workers In Economic Theory
- From: Michael Perelman <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 07:44:00 -0700
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09)
Measuring labor in physical terms is a no-no for economists, suggesting a labor
theory of value. Germans had a tradition of looking at labor in physical terms,
which the conventional economists denounced strongly. This push to turn from
production to circulation goes back centuries.
I wish that I could describe the complexity of the story in a compact form.
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 09:28:06AM -0400, Les Schaffer wrote:
> what do you mean by measure labor? time spent design/building X? calories
> burned doing Y? resources put into motion by hands and brain creating Z?
>
> Les
> _______________________________________________
> pen-l mailing list
> pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929
Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail michael at ecst.csuchico.edu
michaelperelman.wordpress.com
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]