PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
RE: [Pen-l] how about a floor under gas prices?
- To: "Progressive Economics" <pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [Pen-l] how about a floor under gas prices?
- From: "Perelman, Michael" <MPerelman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 20:16:27 -0700
- Thread-index: AcjNzIaahwvEb7lEQEGwHLnh/6kw/QAADrLA
- Thread-topic: [Pen-l] how about a floor under gas prices?
But the tax receipts can be returned for green investment.
-----Original Message-----
Furthermore, northern municipal governments are complaining that
the gas tax is adding such a drain on their municipal budgets that they
can't afford the investment for greener alternatives. i.e. the tax is
counterproductive. It is also adding to the cost of food both from
local producers and also from imported produce that must come by truck
from, primarily, the US and Mexico. etc. etc.
Hans is absolutely right that the development of real alternatives
requires a fundamental change in the way we organize how we live and
produce. But there is nothing in the BC gas tax to provide for any
greener alternatives and, indeed, by shifting the tax burden to the
rural and hinterland population, makes it increasingly difficult for the
disadvantaged to finance any alternative.
But, perhaps in the longer run, the most debilitating effect of
this so-called carbon tax is to create cynicism in the population that a
carbon tax is merely a tax grab for the benefit of the already
privileged , affluent urban population.
Paul Phillips
ehrbar wrote:
> The following is a good article about the problematics Paul and Max
> have been discussing. I highly recommend this article, it brings up
> many other points too (competitiveness, international coordination):
>
> Smith, Stephen, Tax Instruments for Curbing CO2 Emissions, chapter 34
> (pages 505-521) in the Handbook of Environmental and Resource
> Economics, edited by Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh, Edward Elgar 1999.
>
> Smith argues for a "primary" tax on fossil fuels (crude oil, gas,
> and coal), where they are mined, extracted, or imported, as opposed
> taxing final fuels (coke, anthracite, gasoline) because
>
> (a) fewer taxable individuals, no need for fiscal supervision of the
> energy chain
>
> (b) tax authorities do not need knowledge of the carbon 'history' of
> the processing of final fuel products
>
>
--
Paul Phillips Professor Emertus, Economics University of Manitoba Home
and Office: 3806 - 36A st., Vernon BC, Canada. ViT 6E9 tel: 1 (250)
558-0830 email: phillipsp@xxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
- Thread context:
- Re: [Pen-l] how about a floor under gas prices?, (continued)
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]