PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[Pen-l] The Uneasy Relationship between Business and the Humanities
This article titled "The Uneasy Relationship between Business and the
Humanities" became chapter one of Frank Donoghue's "The Last Professors":
http://www.aft.org/pubs-reports/american_academic/issues/june04/Donoghue.qxp.pdf
Early Criticism of the Liberal Arts from Corporate Critics
Let us begin by looking at the turn of the twentieth century, a
period when our nation's universities and economy were growing at an
unprecedented rate. Driven by booming and largely unregulated
industrial growth, America's total national wealth during those years
doubledfrom $87.9 billion in 1900 to $165.4 billion in 1910,
doubling again to $335.4 billion by 1920and no subsequent increases
have ever approached these rates. At the same time, higher
education's growth was also exploding. The country's 18- to
24-year-old population attending college rose from 2.3 percent in
1900 to 2.9 percent in 1910, and by 1930 had risen to 7.2 percent.
Not until the post-World War II era was there a comparable surge in
enrollment. While the number of universities did not grow so
vigorously (increasing from 977 institutions in 1900 to 1,409 in
1930), the number of faculty more than tripledfrom 23,868 in 1900 to
82,386 in 1930. It was during these decadesalthough no one
acknowledged it in exactly these termsboth attackers and defenders
of universities spoke from a position of strength, as reflected in
energetic polemics.
A century ago, attacks on higher education came not from journalists
subsidized by conservative think tanks (such as the Olin Foundation,
which supported both D'Souza and Kimball), but from prominent
industrialists themselves. Because they spoke as unapologetic
capitalists, they made claims that modern critics of the university
would never venture. Andrew Carnegie, the meagerly educated self-made
multimillionaire, was perhaps the earliest and certainly one of the
sharpest critics of traditional liberal arts education and curricula,
the humanities' foreground. He had the following to say in an 1891
commencement address at the Pierce College of Business and Shorthand
of Philadelphia:
"In the storms of life are they [traditional graduates] to be
strengthened and sustained and held to their post and to the
performance of duty by drawing upon Hebrew or Greek barbarians as
models. . .? Is Shakespeare or Homer to be the reservoir from which
they draw? . . . I rejoice, therefore, to know that your time has not
been wasted upon dead languages, but has been fully occupied in
obtaining a knowledge of shorthand and typewriting. . . and that you
are fully equipped to sail upon the element upon which you must live
your lives and earn your living."
Carnegie concludes that "college education as it exists today seems
almost fatal" in the business domain, and he starkly contrasts such
traditionally educated students, "adapted for life on another
planet," to "the future captain of industry. . . hotly engaged in the
school of experience, obtaining the very knowledge required for his
future triumphs". And he lauds the relatively new practice of
populating university boards of trustees with businessmen, noting
what he perceives to be the intransigence of academics, "professors
and principals [presidents] who are bound in their set ways and have
a class feeling about them which makes it impossible to make
reforms." Though he allows that graduates of polytechnic and
scientific schools have an advantage over traditional apprentices in
that they are likely to be "open-minded and without prejudice," he
uses that exception to justify his conviction that the only
worthwhile education is that which has "bearing on a man's career if
he is to make his way to fortune." As a philanthropist, Andrew
Carnegie was true to his word: The terms of the Carnegie Trust for
the Universities of Scotland (his native country) provide for money
for "English Literature and Modern Languages, and such other subjects
cognate to a technical or commercial education."
(clip)
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
- Thread context:
- Power and Propaganda (was Re: [Pen-l] The Uneasy Relationship between Business and the Humanities),
Sandwichman Thu 12 Jun 2008, 04:33 GMT
- [Pen-l] The Uneasy Relationship between Business and the Humanities,
Louis Proyect Wed 11 Jun 2008, 21:43 GMT
- [Pen-l] Henryk Grossman as dependency theorist,
Louis Proyect Wed 11 Jun 2008, 18:14 GMT
- [Pen-l] obama mart,
Dan Scanlan Wed 11 Jun 2008, 01:09 GMT
- [Pen-l] Michael Heinrich versus the crisis-mongerers,
Louis Proyect Tue 10 Jun 2008, 19:00 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]