PEN-L
mailing list archive

Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]

Date:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Thread:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Index:  [ Author  | Date  | Thread  ]

Re: [Pen-l] A reply to Brian Baker on marxist.com



On Apr 30, 2008, at 2:59 PM, raghu wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 11:48 AM, Louis Proyect <lnp3@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The articles generally follow the following formula. (I know this since I have written several of them.) They assert that there is a growing scientific consensus that human agency is a factor in climate change. They neither attempt to prove the consensus is correct nor to disprove. They leave science to the scientists.
What does it mean to say "leave science to the scientists"? Is this all science is - some sort of elitist priesthood inaccessible to the unwashed masses, who should humbly accept what they are told by their intellectual superiors?

Who is the Pope of this new Catholic church? Richard Dawkins?


He's a good candidate. There is also Alan Sokal. If you don't toe the line (or take your place in the pyramid) the mob (includes high priests like Weinberger and low-level goons like "The Amazing Randi") will play pranks on you, ridicule you, etc. ;-)


	--ravi

_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l



Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]