PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: [Pen-l] Peak oil
- To: Progressive Economics <pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Pen-l] Peak oil
- From: troy cochrane <troyc001@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 10:54:15 -0400 (EDT)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.ca; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=nr2OGABv4toTYhrAx4VjZ/+Q8FKJ8tk8lXYwhZe0+VdICSE/YNYXlg3Phk2TkhPp/f/QtxibbtoEbbI4F7XWl1liZ99w7tks7aj6HbioaZ6rCVh5V94Fn9Hd4vSwX/t7znrpQrBE7zs1+vGj8QhPgtpgRP9iRwNUAu1q4LCSKjI=;
Has investment in unconventional oil sources - oilsands and shale oil - increased over this period?
Julio Huato <juliohuato@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: Jad Mouawad (NYT) wrote:
> As oil prices soared to record levels in recent years, basic economics
> suggested that consumption would fall and supplies would rise as
> producers drilled for more oil.
>
> But as prices flirt with $120 a barrel, many energy experts are becoming
> worried that neither seems to be happening. Higher prices have done
> little to suppress global demand or attract new production, and the
> resulting mismatch has sent oil prices ever higher.
Peak oil? This sounds more like an oil bubble.
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing
list
pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
Be smarter than spam. See how smart SpamGuard is at giving junk email the boot with the All-new Yahoo! Mail _______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]