PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
RE: [Pen-l] Peak oil
- To: "Progressive Economics" <pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [Pen-l] Peak oil
- From: "Perelman, Michael" <MPerelman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 17:08:35 -0700
- Thread-index: AciqVglPikdPYDMCTiq9Qkd2SZ8NcQAAC4bg
- Thread-topic: [Pen-l] Peak oil
Or preference for oil companies buying stock instead of investing in
production.
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
michael at ecst.csuchico.edu
Chico, CA 95929
530-898-5321
fax 530-898-5901
www.michaelperelman.wordpress.com
-----Original Message-----
From: pen-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:pen-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Julio Huato
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 5:06 PM
To: pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Pen-l] Peak oil
Jad Mouawad (NYT) wrote:
> As oil prices soared to record levels in recent years, basic economics
> suggested that consumption would fall and supplies would rise as
> producers drilled for more oil.
>
> But as prices flirt with $120 a barrel, many energy experts are
becoming
> worried that neither seems to be happening. Higher prices have done
> little to suppress global demand or attract new production, and the
> resulting mismatch has sent oil prices ever higher.
Peak oil? This sounds more like an oil bubble.
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
- Thread context:
- Re: [Pen-l] Peak oil, (continued)
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]