PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: [Pen-l] Obama remarks
- To: "David B. Shemano" <dshemano@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Progressive Economics" <pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Pen-l] Obama remarks
- From: "Jim Devine" <jdevine03@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 06:32:20 -0700
- Cc:
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=0w/maoBhGQHXX/9iU72+N44DrbRRpUCZYQ9mO85YbME=; b=ORqRpZk2l9UmBjlT7pxnnW9Vc6QVU13Hy1FU4GxO8lqbyAKE82K49I2l1kFdQ7588a3zLGileirD6P9XbIX+a47//nBVxrtU1ZO9ZxKA7qnYBuiqbQ/IrABqMZiTVu4oHpwu5gAcjJBCDVQrpu6ZMYez8Q8ka99XHyoL3194slY=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=vpltE6OWK9KA7CcfVps5+u3kebFtw62h7BlIxuvh37NiWXlTkCp7nlKk6F8O1iS3vXFSyrtQZU3sXc0DxzXxZTM8bc790TkE94DGNFIRmh62R7qn2tGeVB6hKMaDHlf7wXL3mIJ5Zly46tE7rKBAycplfdyVpd374vT+XK5izwI=
David B. Shemano wrote:
> Serious question regarding the Obama remarks regarding guns and religion. I think it is hard to dispute that there is a general right/left dispute over gun ownership, but why? Is there something in Marxism that speaks to gun ownership? Is there a relevance of gun ownership to economic class? I really have a hard time conceptualizing why there is such a strong correlation between opposition to gun ownership and other left-wing views.
I'm feeling a bit ambiguous about this (since cleaning and oiling my
Uzi is so tedious).[*] Keeping my answer narrow, I think that liberals
have over-sold the benefits of gun control and the same time pro-NRA
conservatives have made gun ownership almost a cult. I don't think a
marginal change in gun laws (or their enforcement) would have a major
effect either way. Crime wouldn't go away -- since its roots are deep
and it's so easy to steal with a fountain pen -- and we wouldn't see a
new totalitarianism. I think liberals would do better if they
toned-down their anti-gun rhetoric and even their legislation. Not
having new gun-control legislation wouldn't have much impact, even
from a liberal perspective.
It is also my experience that when conservatives see Black people with
guns (the Panthers, the Deacons), they suddenly become pro-control.
I worry about controlling the guns of the police and armed forces. The
LAPD gets away with murder, as it were.
[*] ¡Charleton, Presente! to be serious, I don't like guns very much.
But that doesn't mean I want to impose my dislikes or likes on
society.
--
Jim Devine / "Segui il tuo corso, e lascia dir le genti." (Go your own
way and let people talk.) -- Karl, paraphrasing Dante.
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
- Thread context:
- RE: [Pen-l] Obama remarks, (continued)
- RE: [Pen-l] Obama remarks,
Louis Proyect Thu 17 Apr 2008, 00:36 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] Obama remarks,
raghu Thu 17 Apr 2008, 00:40 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] Obama remarks,
Chris Finn Thu 17 Apr 2008, 01:05 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] Obama remarks,
Sean Andrews Thu 17 Apr 2008, 03:46 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] Obama remarks,
Jim Devine Thu 17 Apr 2008, 13:17 GMT
- [Pen-l] Obama remarks,
Charles Brown Thu 17 Apr 2008, 16:22 GMT
- [Pen-l] IMF Puts Cost of Crisis Near $1 trillion,
Charles Brown Tue 15 Apr 2008, 20:28 GMT
- [Pen-l] African agriculture,
raghu Tue 15 Apr 2008, 19:03 GMT
- [Pen-l] Battle for Haditha,
Louis Proyect Tue 15 Apr 2008, 16:25 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]