"Max B. Sawicky" wrote:> Ironically enough, the neo-classical micro is more interesting > as a way to model planning, something Marx never got around to.
Carrol Cox wrote:He never got around to it in the same sense as he never got around to applying for Chief of Security Police in Bismarck's government.
Yikes!!
that's true, but we need to understand planning and how to do it, especially how to combine planning with democracy (with the former subordinated to the latter).
The danger is after you study it you could conclude it can't be done.
_______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
- Re: [Pen-l] The Audacity of Data, (continued)
- Re: [Pen-l] The Audacity of Data, Max B. Sawicky Sat 01 Mar 2008, 20:04 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] The Audacity of Data, Max B. Sawicky Sat 01 Mar 2008, 20:02 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] The Audacity of Data, Carrol Cox Sat 01 Mar 2008, 21:36 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] The Audacity of Data, Jim Devine Sat 01 Mar 2008, 21:42 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] The Audacity of Data, Max B. Sawicky Sat 01 Mar 2008, 21:52 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] The Audacity of Data, Jim Devine Sat 01 Mar 2008, 22:53 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] The Audacity of Data, Julio Huato Sun 02 Mar 2008, 16:59 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] The Audacity of Data, Jim Devine Sun 02 Mar 2008, 18:09 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] The Audacity of Data, Eugene Coyle Sun 02 Mar 2008, 20:06 GMT