PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: [Pen-l] Post-Keynesianism at MR?
- To: "Progressive Economics" <pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Pen-l] Post-Keynesianism at MR?
- From: "Jim Devine" <jdevine03@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 21:13:27 -0800
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=l0+CScujxfiadxtgw/gSi75S1aAoilepnywl0upv/ck=; b=GAqntJq12qQduJp293MohJ0qNCiFBXMCw88Ln5Uu+SVwQx6dHH72znXE1eEb57M735PkNLfBUOfFPz+t6h+g5akuAzaHCGn+Da+fH5RrjBYMGX2LUXNsgAwXceXFa/NYnGp7VRZ6eOUPB9Nqm/RLm0nYNRlI8mpk71RIVhvm38I=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=TF+WaWbrPKu/YmOglxKl8KAH35Yzew5WWPt1WfYsaGZZn58+iFvZ2VeP+5V0dSMQcOkdkooc32p+e+dtQ64rckGyZkHoFT+gkHUNNyOhYNQLO13ylqGBDyG/u/Y0R2T9Us/60MRRd2Dteo49oEGLQWSRwJ90F2GDF8WDQAmrlZE=
interestingly, back in the 1970s, when a survey article (by Eichner &
Kregel) about PK economics appeared the JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC
LITERATURE, one of the bibliography entries was for Baran & Sweezy's
MONOPOLY CAPITAL. However, as far as I can tell, the article never
actually cited the book.
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 8:35 PM, Forstater, Mathew <ForstaterM@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Monopoly Capital brand neo-Marxism has always drawn on Keynes, Kalecki, and
> Schumpeter. (Sweezy was Schumpeter's graduate assistant at Harvard, by the
> way.) Since Minsky drew on Keynes, Kalecki, Schumpeter, and Marx, it is no
> surprise that he fits in there as well. Some Classical Marxist critics of
> the Monopoly Capital school, such as Shaikh, have long argued that Sweezy et
> al didn't think Marx had a theory of effective demand and so looked to
> Keynes and Kalecki for one. That said, I believe they were always critical
> of conventional Keynesian economics and policy, and view of the State. MF
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
>
> From: pen-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:pen-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Gernot Koehler
> Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 4:22 PM
> To: pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [Pen-l] Post-Keynesianism at MR?
>
>
>
>
> I read John Bellamy Foster's article "Monopoly-Finance Capital" (Monthly
> Review 2006), which is of interest in the context of current debates. What
> struck me is the importance in Foster's discussion of such authors as
> Keynes, Schumpeter, Kalecki, and Minsky; and there is a Sweezy quote like
> "conceptualization of the capital accumulation process is one-sided and
> incomplete" and a Foster statement like "Both production and finance under
> capitalism are at one and the same time both real and monetary in nature."
> GK
> ________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pen-l mailing list
> pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
>
>
--
Jim Devine / "Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet
engines." -- John Benfield
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
- Thread context:
- [Pen-l] Unsubscribe Please, (continued)
- [Pen-l] flip-flops,
Jim Devine Thu 28 Feb 2008, 16:54 GMT
- [Pen-l] Post-Keynesianism at MR?,
Gernot Koehler Wed 27 Feb 2008, 22:10 GMT
- [Pen-l] Samuelson is joining Shakespeare and Schubert at liberal arts schools?,
raghu Wed 27 Feb 2008, 20:16 GMT
- [Pen-l] Beyond Belief,
Louis Proyect Wed 27 Feb 2008, 19:58 GMT
- [Pen-l] Buckley dead,
Bill Lear Wed 27 Feb 2008, 16:49 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]