A truly damning document. Departure Assessment To Ambassador Crocker From Manuel Miranda, Office of Legislative Statecraft

[Leigh Meyers <the.buffalo.in.the.midst@xxxxxxxxx>]

My comment onsite:

This memo seems to be a bold admission that the U.S. government is
attempting to engineer an Iraq in it's own image with little regard to
the interests of Iraqis, their society, and culture:

Miranda: "I support the President's policy that ignores the historic
stereotypes(?) of the Middle East and offers the region a culture of
liberty protected by responsible government and the rule of law."

I would HAVE TO ASSUME Mr. Miranda means "WESTERN Law", such as the
one that foists Monsanto owned GMO crops off on Iraqi farmers against
their better judgment and will, almost at gunpoint by US soldiers
during Operation Amber Waves.

Little do these farmers know about 'patent law' and how those crops,
and any contaminated crops surrounding those crops are OWNED by
Monsanto et al... and indeed, little should they have to know, except
for the enforcement of 'western law' foreign to not only Iraqi
culture, but truly foreign to muslim culture in totality.

Also, despite the consistently discredited brash claim that "...a
long-term American military presence (is) ...welcomed by the
overwhelming majority of Iraqis.."

I believe it would be just as brash to claim that the State department
is any more welcome than our military, except perhaps in it's historic
stereotypical (sic) role as an arbiter of trade and diplomatic
relations.

Received this  commentary on Ambassador Ryan Crocker and State's
effort in Iraq yesterday (Friday) morning.  Highlights are mine.
Comments from the different communities affected are requested.

M E M O R A N D U M

To:             Ambassador Crocker
From           Manuel Miranda, Office of Legislative Statecraft
CC:             ALCON
Date:           February 5, 2008
Re:             Departure Assessment of Embassy Baghdad
__________________________________________________________________

Introduction

As I prepare to sign out after a year with the State Department, I
feel it my last duty to offer you my assessment of what I observed.
Please accept this assessment in that spirit.  The presence of so many
Section 3161 temporary direct hires in various areas of expertise in
the Embassy is a unique opportunity for the evaluation and oversight
of the Foreign Service and the State Department's bureaucracy and
competence, whether it is a Service at War or Peace.

We all have opinions.  If there is any doubt of the sincerity of mine,
I am ready to share to list the names of those scores of other 3161's
who share it, each from the vantage point of their areas of expertise
and particular experience in the Embassy.

I have kept my observations to the areas that I have most directly
observed as Senior Advisor for Legislative Framework in the Iraq
Reconstruction Management Office and the Embassy's Rule of Law
community, and as Director of the Office for Legislative Statecraft in
the Political Section.  I apply to this assessment my background as a
former counsel to the Senate Majority Leader and as a student of legal
institutions, and, as importantly, as a lawyer with 12 years
experience in sovereign government negotiations, comparative and
international law, and the legal framework and conditions needed for
foreign direct investment in energy infrastructure and domestic
economic progress and stability in developing democracies.

Nothing in this assessment is intended to be critical of General
Petraeus, his leadership, his staff, the efforts of the Coalition
forces in Iraq, or the success of the security component of the
"Surge" initiative, now one year old.  Nothing in this assessment is
intended to cast doubt on the diplomatic strengths of the Foreign
Service in Iraq.  Nothing in this assessment should be read as
critical of the hundreds of civilian men and women, of all ages and
backgrounds, who work in Iraq tirelessly and at great personal
sacrifice of their careers and family lives, and the many at lower
levels of internal management who support us.  Although my assessment
is limited to certain areas of expertise, it is applicable
Embassy-wide.

I should point out that I support America's mission in Iraq, while
fully recognizing our many errors over time.  I support the
President's policy that ignores the historic stereotypes of the Middle
East and offers the region a culture of liberty protected by
responsible government and the rule of law.  I support a long-term
American military presence in Iraqi bases, welcomed by the
overwhelming majority of Iraqis and a democratically-elected
government, as a means of bringing peace and stability to the region,
as we did in Europe and the Far East.  History may recognize this end
as singularly worthy of the sacrifice that America's sons and
daughters have made.  I believe, however, that the potential for this
peace requires the progress of Iraqi society and the confidence of the
Iraqi people in their government.

That civilian progress, and the Pax Americana, will not be achieved
with the Foreign Service and the State Department's bureaucracy at the
helm of America's number one policy consideration.  You are simply not
up to the task, and many of you will readily and honestly admit it.  I
believe that a better job can be done.   It is simply that we have
brought to Iraq the worst of America â our bureaucrats â and failed to
apply, as President Roosevelt once did, the high-caliber leadership
class and intellectual talent, whose rallying has defined all of
America's finest hours.

Summary

America's success in Iraq requires pacifying the country and assisting
its government to inspire the confidence of Iraq's people.  America
can be confident that the former task is in good hands, but the latter
effort will fail if we continue to rely on the State Department and
the Foreign Service to lead or manage our civilian support efforts.
As we did with the military Surge, America and Iraq would be well
served by retaining our diplomats to do the work of diplomacy, but
putting the effort to stand up the GOI in more competent hands.  This
is especially true in the areas of legislative reform and the rule of
law.  But it is also true in other areas.

At stake, as a whole, is not only the success of the mission, the
lives of Americans and the future of a country for which we must now
bear some responsibility, but also hundreds of millions of taxpayer
dollars being wasted and poorly managed.

GENERAL ASSESSMENT...

In full @ Mountainrunner:
http://mountainrunner.us/2008/02/departure_assessment_of_embass.html