Max B. Sawicky wrote:Anyway, Cox was going on about how much better off we are these days because we have innovations like many varieties of bottled water, even though the stuff coming out of the tap is periodically found to have uncomfortable levels of doo-doo.
but haven't other studies found that tap water is often cleaner than bottled water?
I believe one of the criticisms of the bottled water fad is that whereas the tap water is regulated (for % faecal content, etc) there is very little of that for the bottled stuff. See:
http://www.nrdc.org/water/drinking/nbw.asp (yet another badly formatted web page, unfortunately)
--ravi
- Re: it's the water [was: apologia], (continued)
- Re: it's the water [was: apologia], Max B. Sawicky Sun 10 Feb 2008, 16:55 GMT
- Re: it's the water [was: apologia], Michael Perelman Sun 10 Feb 2008, 17:01 GMT
- Re: it's the water [was: apologia], Jim Devine Sun 10 Feb 2008, 17:16 GMT
- Re: it's the water [was: apologia], Leigh Meyers Sun 10 Feb 2008, 17:30 GMT
- Re: it's the water [was: apologia], ravi Sun 10 Feb 2008, 17:23 GMT
- apologia, Jim Devine Sun 10 Feb 2008, 16:08 GMT
- Re: apologia, Max B. Sawicky Sun 10 Feb 2008, 16:23 GMT
- Re: apologia, Doyle Saylor Sun 10 Feb 2008, 17:29 GMT
- Re: apologia, Leigh Meyers Sun 10 Feb 2008, 17:32 GMT