PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Let.s Go Hillary
>>> Louis Proyect
> CB: No, they considered it a Business Party, and said so.
>
Do you have a citation for that? I, of course, am not referring to the
"3rd period", when the CP was certainly hostile to the Democrats.
^^^^
CB: Why aren't you referring to the "3rd period" ?
I believe I saw it in Party programs. Earliest one I saw was about 1964
or 68. I think it is in other literature too. "Business" is usually
modified by "Big".
Recall Gus Hall and Angela Davis ran for Pres and VP in 1980. So, there
is likely a statement in lit describing the Dems and Reps as parties of
Big Business as part of the rationale for the campaign.
- Thread context:
- Re: Let.s Go Hillary, (continued)
- Re: Let.s Go Hillary,
Charles Brown Thu 07 Feb 2008, 16:46 GMT
- Re: Let.s Go Hillary,
Louis Proyect Thu 07 Feb 2008, 16:54 GMT
- Re: Let.s Go Hillary,
Charles Brown Thu 07 Feb 2008, 17:08 GMT
- Re: Let.s Go Hillary,
Louis Proyect Thu 07 Feb 2008, 17:13 GMT
- Re: Let.s Go Hillary,
Charles Brown Thu 07 Feb 2008, 17:22 GMT
- Re: Let.s Go Hillary,
Jim Devine Thu 07 Feb 2008, 17:22 GMT
- Re: Let.s Go Hillary,
Charles Brown Thu 07 Feb 2008, 19:18 GMT
- Re: Let.s Go Hillary,
Jim Devine Thu 07 Feb 2008, 20:44 GMT
- Re: Let.s Go Hillary,
Charles Brown Thu 07 Feb 2008, 21:06 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]