I got the same line many years ago -- the students need the standard material to get into grad school but when they get to grad school they'll get the real poop. Part of crushing the Notre Dame econ department was the same -- the students won't be prepared or even eligible for grad school.
Gene Coyle
On Jan 10, 2008, at 7:24 AM, Max B. Sawicky wrote:
When I was teaching, one consideration was that students signed on to get the standard mainstream poop, so it would not be fair to burden and likely confuse some of them with radical alternative views. (Putting aside the fact that I wasn't very well situated to provide alternative views at that point.)
what's truly sad about the review of Mankiw is how accurately the author describes _all_ mainstream textbooks (or 99% of economics textbooks). It's not just Mankiw.
- Re: Adbusters: Mankiw as a propaganda hack, (continued)
- Re: Adbusters: Mankiw as a propaganda hack, Jim Devine Thu 10 Jan 2008, 14:37 GMT
- Re: Adbusters: Mankiw as a propaganda hack, Jim Devine Thu 10 Jan 2008, 15:10 GMT
- Re: Adbusters: Mankiw as a propaganda hack, Michael Perelman Thu 10 Jan 2008, 16:46 GMT
- Re: Adbusters: Mankiw as a propaganda hack, Max B. Sawicky Thu 10 Jan 2008, 15:15 GMT
- Re: Adbusters: Mankiw as a propaganda hack, Eugene Coyle Thu 10 Jan 2008, 20:17 GMT
- Re: Adbusters: Mankiw as a propaganda hack, Max B. Sawicky Thu 10 Jan 2008, 20:22 GMT
- Re: Adbusters: Mankiw as a propaganda hack, Jim Devine Thu 10 Jan 2008, 22:39 GMT
- The Wall Street Journal Becomes Underconsumptionist, Michael Perelman Wed 09 Jan 2008, 02:45 GMT
- Re: The Wall Street Journal Becomes Underconsumptionist, Jim Devine Wed 09 Jan 2008, 14:15 GMT