Re: Why the peak oil debate is through

[sartesian <sartesian@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Well perhaps the unsubscriber should lead the way and delineate the
deeper, more substantive issues.  I would be quite interested in seeing
other more profound treatments of the real economic issues at the heart
of the contest.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Perelman" <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <PEN-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, September 16, 2007 12:04 PM
Subject: [PEN-L] Why the peak oil debate is through


> I got this from a valued, long time member:
>
> These are issues that should engage left economists. The
superficiality
> of the debate on pen-l is discouraging.  I will continue to monitor
> pen-l on the archives, but unless the level and the content of debate
> improves I will not be resubscribing.
> --
> Michael Perelman
> Economics Department
> California State University
> Chico, CA 95929
>
> Tel. 530-898-5321
> E-Mail michael at ecst.csuchico.edu
> michaelperelman.wordpress.com
>