Why the peak oil debate is through

To: PEN-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Why the peak oil debate is through
From: Michael Perelman <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 09:04:57 -0700
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i

I got this from a valued, long time member:

These are issues that should engage left economists. The superficiality
of the debate on pen-l is discouraging.  I will continue to monitor
pen-l on the archives, but unless the level and the content of debate
improves I will not be resubscribing.
--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929

Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail michael at ecst.csuchico.edu
michaelperelman.wordpress.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why the peak oil debate is through
  - From: Louis Proyect
- Re: Why the peak oil debate is through
  - From: sartesian

Prev by Date: new radio product
Next by Date: Re: Greenspan: the Iraq war was largely about oil
Previous by thread: new radio product
Next by thread: Re: Why the peak oil debate is through
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- The Fall in the Value of Labor-power as a Contributor to the Tendency of the Rate of Profit to Decline, Louis Proyect Sun 16 Sep 2007, 17:26 GMT
  - Re: The Fall in the Value of Labor-power as a Contributor to the Tendency of the Rate of Profit to Decline, Jim Devine Sun 16 Sep 2007, 17:51 GMT
- calls for government regulation, Jim Devine Sun 16 Sep 2007, 17:22 GMT
- More than 1,000,000 Iraqis murdered since 2003 invasion, Alejandro Valle Baeza Sun 16 Sep 2007, 16:59 GMT
- Why the peak oil debate is through, Michael Perelman Sun 16 Sep 2007, 16:01 GMT
  - Re: Why the peak oil debate is through, sartesian Sun 16 Sep 2007, 16:12 GMT
  - Re: Why the peak oil debate is through, Louis Proyect Sun 16 Sep 2007, 16:13 GMT
    - Re: Why the peak oil debate is through, sartesian Sun 16 Sep 2007, 16:15 GMT
    - Re: Why the peak oil debate is through, Michael Perelman Sun 16 Sep 2007, 16:28 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]