PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]
Date:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Thread:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Index:  [ Author  | Date  | Thread  ]

Re: The 'Bone of Contention' -or- Why no one cares to discuss 'Peak Anything'

On 9/15/07, sartesian <sartesian@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
> What's simple and stark is that the relation between profits and "the
> general welfare" is inverse; has become inverted.  And to explain that,
> we need economic, social, historical, Marxist analysis, not natural,
> geological, catastrophe scenarios.
>

I'm not seeing the "...natural, geological, catastrophe scenarios."
you speak of, in this article. Although without economic, social,
historical analysis of a socially humane nature (...and Stan Goff, as
I do, rejects so-called 'Marxist analysis' as having a terminally
flawed implementation in, at least, American society), that other
group of catastrophic events are quite likely, quite soon.

Leigh
[ Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]