On Sep 13, 2007, at 10:20 AM, Jim Devine wrote:
On 9/13/07, Doug Henwood <dhenwood@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:It's not just the PF's charter - it's the law. That's why there's only so much you can do with pension fund socialism, ha ha. But it would have been interesting to hear this dude reflect on the irony. He didn't even try.
he was a hired gun, no?
Sure. But a lot of hired guns have a canned rap prepared by publicists; I've heard scores, maybe thousands of them. Either the issue never came up before or he just didn't care.
Doug
- Re: Public Employees for Privatization, (continued)
- Re: Public Employees for Privatization, Doug Henwood Thu 13 Sep 2007, 12:47 GMT
- Re: Public Employees for Privatization, Jim Devine Thu 13 Sep 2007, 13:17 GMT
- Re: Public Employees for Privatization, Doug Henwood Thu 13 Sep 2007, 14:14 GMT
- Re: Public Employees for Privatization, Jim Devine Thu 13 Sep 2007, 14:16 GMT
- Re: Public Employees for Privatization, Doug Henwood Thu 13 Sep 2007, 14:19 GMT
- Re: Public Employees for Privatization, Michael Perelman Thu 13 Sep 2007, 14:52 GMT
- Re: Public Employees for Privatization, ken hanly Thu 13 Sep 2007, 14:53 GMT
- Re: Public Employees for Privatization, Michael Perelman Thu 13 Sep 2007, 14:57 GMT
- Re: Public Employees for Privatization, Doug Henwood Thu 13 Sep 2007, 15:18 GMT