On Sep 13, 2007, at 9:20 AM, Jim Devine wrote:
On 9/13/07, Doug Henwood <dhenwood@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:Hey, remember Calpers was at the forefront of the shareholder revolution, pushing downsizing and outsourcing (not directly of course, but that was the result). When I interviewed their chief investment officer about 15 years ago and asked him about the irony of workers' funds being used to push an anti-worker agenda, he said their goal was to maximize returns.
aren't pension managers supposed to be "prudent" and seek the highest returns for their clients, as part of the pension fund's charter? -
It's not just the PF's charter - it's the law. That's why there's only so much you can do with pension fund socialism, ha ha. But it would have been interesting to hear this dude reflect on the irony. He didn't even try.
Doug
- ccia u.s. fair use economy, Sean Andrews Thu 13 Sep 2007, 14:19 GMT
- Public Employees for Privatization, Michael Perelman Thu 13 Sep 2007, 04:03 GMT
- Re: Public Employees for Privatization, Doug Henwood Thu 13 Sep 2007, 12:47 GMT
- Re: Public Employees for Privatization, Jim Devine Thu 13 Sep 2007, 13:17 GMT
- Re: Public Employees for Privatization, Doug Henwood Thu 13 Sep 2007, 14:14 GMT
- Re: Public Employees for Privatization, Jim Devine Thu 13 Sep 2007, 14:16 GMT
- Re: Public Employees for Privatization, Doug Henwood Thu 13 Sep 2007, 14:19 GMT
- Re: Public Employees for Privatization, Michael Perelman Thu 13 Sep 2007, 14:52 GMT
- Re: Public Employees for Privatization, ken hanly Thu 13 Sep 2007, 14:53 GMT