PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: PEN-L Digest - 17 Jun 2007 to 18 Jun 2007 (#2007-172)
- To: PEN-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: PEN-L Digest - 17 Jun 2007 to 18 Jun 2007 (#2007-172)
- From: ann li <ann_z_li@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 14:23:47 -0400
- User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (Windows/20070509)
On channeling Walras and a strawberry alarm clock:
I have some of my usual confusion, so I will apologize in advance for
asking a stupid question...
Michael, how Walrasian is that idea when Callon is positive, yet
cautious, regarding the use of ANT since its use does allow for “the
variety of possible configurations of the action” despite some
potentially essentialized or dichotomized premises on what constitutes
voluntary action? What would this mean for proposing non- or
post-walrasian concepts?
For example, Callon (1997) says further in a similar writing: “ANT
enables one to go further than do traditional socio-economics or
analyses in terms of networks proposed by people like Granovetter.
Markets are not embedded in networks. In other words, there is no point
in adding social, interpersonal, or informal relations in order to
understand their functioning. A concrete market is the result of
operations of disentanglement, framing, internalization and
externalization. To understand a market it is necessary first to agree
to take what it does seriously; that is to say, the construction of
calculative actors who consider themselves to be quits once the
transaction has been concluded. This does not mean that everything has
been framed and internalized and that no relations other than market
relations exist. I have suggested that complete disentanglement is
impossible; framing can function and survive only if there are
overflowing and connections which have not been internalized. But it is
one thing to see these links and relations as having been voluntarily
and actively rejected from the framework of market relations, with the
precise aim of locally and temporarily purifying market relations; it is
quite another thing to say that the market is possible and functions
only because these relations are present and form, in a sense, the
substratum of market exchange.” (p.8,
http://www.lancs.ac.uk/fss/sociology/papers/callon-market-test.pdf)
Ann
- Thread context:
- Channeling Walras continued,
ann li Wed 20 Jun 2007, 14:36 GMT
- Hamas op-ed pieces in today's NY Times and Washington Post,
Marvin Gandall Wed 20 Jun 2007, 14:33 GMT
- Israel's Roaring Economy,
Jonathan Nitzan Wed 20 Jun 2007, 05:53 GMT
- Re: PEN-L Digest - 17 Jun 2007 to 18 Jun 2007 (#2007-172),
ann li Tue 19 Jun 2007, 18:14 GMT
- Rampage Across Athens,
Leigh Meyers Tue 19 Jun 2007, 17:37 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]