PEN-L
mailing list archive

Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]

Date:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Thread:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Index:  [ Author  | Date  | Thread  ]

Re: PEN-L Digest - 17 Jun 2007 to 18 Jun 2007 (#2007-172)



On channeling Walras and a strawberry alarm clock:

I have some of my usual confusion, so I will apologize in advance for asking a stupid question...

Michael, how Walrasian is that idea when Callon is positive, yet cautious, regarding the use of ANT since its use does allow for “the variety of possible configurations of the action” despite some potentially essentialized or dichotomized premises on what constitutes voluntary action? What would this mean for proposing non- or post-walrasian concepts?

For example, Callon (1997) says further in a similar writing: “ANT enables one to go further than do traditional socio-economics or analyses in terms of networks proposed by people like Granovetter. Markets are not embedded in networks. In other words, there is no point in adding social, interpersonal, or informal relations in order to understand their functioning. A concrete market is the result of operations of disentanglement, framing, internalization and externalization. To understand a market it is necessary first to agree to take what it does seriously; that is to say, the construction of calculative actors who consider themselves to be quits once the transaction has been concluded. This does not mean that everything has been framed and internalized and that no relations other than market relations exist. I have suggested that complete disentanglement is impossible; framing can function and survive only if there are overflowing and connections which have not been internalized. But it is one thing to see these links and relations as having been voluntarily and actively rejected from the framework of market relations, with the precise aim of locally and temporarily purifying market relations; it is quite another thing to say that the market is possible and functions only because these relations are present and form, in a sense, the substratum of market exchange.” (p.8, http://www.lancs.ac.uk/fss/sociology/papers/callon-market-test.pdf)

Ann



Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]