At 10:47 09/06/2007, you wrote:On 9 Jun, 2007, at 10:41 AM, Jim Devine wrote:
for what reason do you consider this to be spam?
The all-caps Subject line that runs to 23 [?] words? ;-)
That was an error on my part to simply copy and paste hurriedly. But I don't think that was the issue that led to the **SPAM** label.
I was writing that in jest... please do not take it seriously. I have the utmost regard for Hari so I too am curious why he found your message SPAM. I thought it was an important message.
--ravi
- Re: IN FAVOR OF DEMOCRACY IN THE MEDIA, OF THE LEGITIMATE RIGHT OF, Hari Kumar Sat 09 Jun 2007, 13:31 GMT
- Re: IN FAVOR OF DEMOCRACY IN THE MEDIA, OF THE LEGITIMATE RIGHT OF, Jim Devine Sat 09 Jun 2007, 14:32 GMT
- Re: IN FAVOR OF DEMOCRACY IN THE MEDIA, OF THE LEGITIMATE RIGHT OF, ravi Sat 09 Jun 2007, 14:38 GMT
- Re: IN FAVOR OF DEMOCRACY IN THE MEDIA, OF THE LEGITIMATE RIGHT OF, michael a. lebowitz Sat 09 Jun 2007, 18:13 GMT
- Re: IN FAVOR OF DEMOCRACY ..., ravi Sun 10 Jun 2007, 01:59 GMT
- Message not available
- Re: IN FAVOR OF DEMOCRACY IN THE MEDIA, OF THE LEGITIMATE RIGHT OF, michael a. lebowitz Sat 09 Jun 2007, 18:10 GMT
- Energy Economics In A Vacuum, Leigh Meyers Sat 09 Jun 2007, 13:31 GMT
- Re: Energy Economics In A Vacuum, sartesian Sat 09 Jun 2007, 14:28 GMT
- Marxmail exchange on Cockburn and his latest "expert", Louis Proyect Fri 08 Jun 2007, 22:46 GMT