Then, while reading an article about rural land redistribution, it hit me: this IS how shit works in Venezuela. See, the rural land redistribution works like this: some squatters go and burn down a big rancher's crops, tell him that they own the land now, and then demand that Chávez let them keep the land, which he often does. As a result, lot's of once productive land is now being used by people who either don't really know what they're doing, don't have the capital to do it, or both. Also, once productive land owners are no longer investing in their land or animals because they fear that it will be a waste. Why grow sugar cane or raise a chicken when some squatter is just going to take it away from you with the blessing of the federal government?
EB may be an idiot, but it seems to me that he has a point about the land redistribution. Is there infrastructure in place to train and educate the new landowners? Are the old land-owners compensated for the repossessed land? Do they have incentives to stay and help with a transition? Is there any official planning to cope with the inevitable loss of productivity in the transition period?
(Apologies in advance to Michael L. if this information is well-known - I haven't got around to reading "Build it now.." yet..) -raghu.
- Re: NACLA on RCTV, (continued)
- Re: NACLA on RCTV, Jim Devine Wed 06 Jun 2007, 14:08 GMT
- Message not available
- Re: NACLA on RCTV, michael a. lebowitz Wed 06 Jun 2007, 23:12 GMT
- Re: NACLA on RCTV, Jim Devine Thu 07 Jun 2007, 01:46 GMT
- Message not available
- Re: NACLA on RCTV, michael a. lebowitz Thu 07 Jun 2007, 03:52 GMT
- Re: NACLA on RCTV, raghu Wed 06 Jun 2007, 19:11 GMT
- Message not available
- Re: NACLA on RCTV, michael a. lebowitz Wed 06 Jun 2007, 22:50 GMT
- Re: NACLA on RCTV, David B. Shemano Thu 07 Jun 2007, 02:02 GMT
- Re: NACLA on RCTV, ken hanly Thu 07 Jun 2007, 02:34 GMT
- Re: NACLA on RCTV, michael a. lebowitz Thu 07 Jun 2007, 03:54 GMT