Doug Henwood wrote: > > I'm intrigued to learn that the critique of Roy is all about her > personality. I thought the Toor essay was an excellent analysis of > how she functions as a commodified celebrity, and how the new class > created by "neoliberalism" functions within India and in its > relations with the outside world (including the Indian diaspora).
Still not a word about the content of any of Roy's writings. Is it that you know nothing of India and therefore can't respond to content?
This is just weird.
Che has been a bigger commodity in both the North and the South for a much longer time, before and after his death, but few Marxists would dismiss him and his ideas just because of that. -- Yoshie
- Re: criticising Arundhati Roy, (continued)
- Re: criticising Arundhati Roy, Yoshie Furuhashi Sun 15 Apr 2007, 22:54 GMT
- Re: criticising Arundhati Roy, Michael Perelman Sun 15 Apr 2007, 22:58 GMT
- Re: criticising Arundhati Roy, Doug Henwood Sun 15 Apr 2007, 23:10 GMT
- Re: criticising Arundhati Roy, Carrol Cox Sun 15 Apr 2007, 23:22 GMT
- Re: criticising Arundhati Roy, Yoshie Furuhashi Sun 15 Apr 2007, 23:26 GMT
- Re: criticising Arundhati Roy, Michael Perelman Sun 15 Apr 2007, 23:42 GMT
- Re: criticising Arundhati Roy, Bill Lear Sun 15 Apr 2007, 23:58 GMT
- Re: criticising Arundhati Roy, Yoshie Furuhashi Sun 15 Apr 2007, 23:18 GMT