A lot of what I've heard her say seems somewhat like moralizing, but she can reach a broad swath of people that would never bother with what we have to say. I know that she would be a big draw at Chico and that her presence would be a very positive influence.
I'm more concerned with the way that is we tend to tear down our natural allies. If she were promoting something negative, like an invasion of another country or some pro-corporate policies, criticism would be in order. Or am I missing something about her of which I should be aware?
An intellectual who sides with lower classes and castes and criticizes a majority of her class and/or caste for failing or refusing to do so should be welcome to the communist Left, even if she is not a communist herself. In old days, such an intellectual might have been called a fellow traveler. -- Yoshie
- Re: Arundhati Roy on India and Its Maoists, (continued)
- Re: Arundhati Roy on India and Its Maoists, raghu Sun 15 Apr 2007, 02:26 GMT
- Re: Arundhati Roy on India and Its Maoists, Yoshie Furuhashi Sun 15 Apr 2007, 03:54 GMT
- Re: Arundhati Roy on India and Its Maoists, ravi Sun 15 Apr 2007, 03:03 GMT
- Re: Arundhati Roy on India and Its Maoists, Michael Perelman Sun 15 Apr 2007, 03:11 GMT
- Re: Arundhati Roy on India and Its Maoists, Yoshie Furuhashi Sun 15 Apr 2007, 14:12 GMT
- 'Billionaires for Coal' Celebrate Earth Day, Leigh Meyers Sat 14 Apr 2007, 21:21 GMT
- Doomsday for the Greenback, Leigh Meyers Sat 14 Apr 2007, 21:07 GMT
- Re: Doomsday for the Greenback, Shane Mage Sun 15 Apr 2007, 03:47 GMT
- Message not available
- Re: Doomsday for the Greenback, Leigh Meyers Sun 15 Apr 2007, 04:44 GMT