Turning to the matter of whether our government was involved, the "IF," it is possible that a definitive case can not yet be made. But there is a very solid case that the buildings did not simply collapse as a result of the aircraft-induced damage and fires. The laws of physics would have to have been suspended for the buildings to fall at free-fall speed.
Just a reminder.
There was an exhaustive analysis of these matters by a physicist on Counterpunch:
http://www.counterpunch.org/darkfire11282006.html
- news from the ONION, Jim Devine Fri 16 Mar 2007, 19:33 GMT
- Barbara Walters' ABC interview with Chavez, michael a. lebowitz Fri 16 Mar 2007, 16:24 GMT
- quotation du jour, Jim Devine Fri 16 Mar 2007, 15:29 GMT
- Re: quotation du jour [was 911 considered/reconsidered ...], Peter Hollings Fri 16 Mar 2007, 22:49 GMT
- Re: quotation du jour [was 911 considered/reconsidered ...], Louis Proyect Fri 16 Mar 2007, 23:37 GMT
- Re: quotation du jour [was 911 considered/reconsidered ...], Peter Hollings Sat 17 Mar 2007, 20:38 GMT
- Re: quotation du jour [was 911 considered/reconsidered ...], Louis Proyect Sat 17 Mar 2007, 21:06 GMT
- Re: quotation du jour [was 911 considered/reconsidered ...], Mark Lause Sat 17 Mar 2007, 21:36 GMT
- Re: quotation du jour [was 911 considered/reconsidered ...], ravi Sun 18 Mar 2007, 16:20 GMT