Re: 911 considered/reconsidered -- a radical intervention

To: PEN-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: 911 considered/reconsidered -- a radical intervention
From: Michael Perelman <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 07:47:44 -0700
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i

I don't think this is useful.  You have heard that from me before.

Thanks.
--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929

Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail michael at ecst.csuchico.edu
michaelperelman.wordpress.com

References:
- 911 considered/reconsidered -- a radical intervention
  - From: Paul Zarembka
- Re: 911 considered/reconsidered -- a radical intervention
  - From: Doug Henwood
- Re: 911 considered/reconsidered -- a radical intervention
  - From: Jim Devine

Prev by Date: Re: 911 considered/reconsidered -- a radical intervention [off-list]
Next by Date: new internet scam
Previous by thread: Re: 911 considered/reconsidered -- a radical intervention
Next by thread: Re: 911 considered/reconsidered -- a radical intervention
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- 911 considered/reconsidered -- a radical intervention, Paul Zarembka Fri 16 Mar 2007, 12:59 GMT
  - Re: 911 considered/reconsidered -- a radical intervention, Doug Henwood Fri 16 Mar 2007, 13:07 GMT
    - Re: 911 considered/reconsidered -- a radical intervention, Jim Devine Fri 16 Mar 2007, 13:44 GMT
      
      Re: 911 considered/reconsidered -- a radical intervention, Mark Lause Fri 16 Mar 2007, 13:59 GMT
      
      Re: 911 considered/reconsidered -- a radical intervention, Michael Perelman Fri 16 Mar 2007, 14:41 GMT
  - Re: 911 considered/reconsidered -- a radical intervention, Daniel Davies Fri 16 Mar 2007, 15:20 GMT
    - Re: 911 considered/reconsidered -- a radical intervention, Michael Perelman Fri 16 Mar 2007, 15:32 GMT
- New *Media* Sponsor For A U.S. Department of Peace, Leigh Meyers Fri 16 Mar 2007, 06:19 GMT
- Senate Says No to Retreat, Yoshie Furuhashi Fri 16 Mar 2007, 04:04 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]