heck, most of pen-l is in on it.
On Mar 16, 2007, at 9:04 AM, Paul Zarembka wrote:
> Just in two last weeks, a video has surfaced that a BBC > reporter, probably reading from a teleprompter, stated that WTC 7 had > collapsed -- 23 minutes BEFORE it happened and with the building in > her > background! BBC is really squirming on this one.
Wow, you mean the BBC was in on it? A conspiracy so immense!
Seriously, if the BBC was in on it, thousands of people were in on it - and none of them has yapped? You can't be serious.
Doug
-- Jim Devine / "The truth is more important than the facts." -- Frank Lloyd Wright
- Re: new internet scam, (continued)
- Re: new internet scam, Leigh Meyers Fri 16 Mar 2007, 16:32 GMT
- Re: 911 considered/reconsidered -- a radical intervention [off-list], Jim Devine Fri 16 Mar 2007, 14:09 GMT
- 911 considered/reconsidered -- a radical intervention, Paul Zarembka Fri 16 Mar 2007, 12:59 GMT
- Re: 911 considered/reconsidered -- a radical intervention, Doug Henwood Fri 16 Mar 2007, 13:07 GMT
- Re: 911 considered/reconsidered -- a radical intervention, Jim Devine Fri 16 Mar 2007, 13:44 GMT
- Re: 911 considered/reconsidered -- a radical intervention, Mark Lause Fri 16 Mar 2007, 13:59 GMT
- Re: 911 considered/reconsidered -- a radical intervention, Michael Perelman Fri 16 Mar 2007, 14:41 GMT
- Re: 911 considered/reconsidered -- a radical intervention, Daniel Davies Fri 16 Mar 2007, 15:20 GMT
- Re: 911 considered/reconsidered -- a radical intervention, Michael Perelman Fri 16 Mar 2007, 15:32 GMT