PEN-L
mailing list archive

Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]

Date:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Thread:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Index:  [ Author  | Date  | Thread  ]

Re: The Last Days of the American Republic



On 3/14/07, paul phillips <phillipsp@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Has anyone on pen-l read this?  If so, what reaction?

 Paul P

Chalmers Johnson: "Nemesis: The Last Days of the American Republic"
Democracy Now
Tuesday 27 February 2007
<snip>
By the subtitle, I really do mean it. This is not just hype to sell
books - "The Last Days of the American Republic." I'm here concerned with a
very real, concrete problem in political analysis, namely that the political
system of the United States today, history tells us, is one of the most
unstable combinations there is - that is, domestic democracy and foreign
empire - that the choices are stark. A nation can be one or the other, a
democracy or an imperialist, but it can't be both. If it sticks to
imperialism, it will, like the old Roman Republic, on which so much of our
system was modeled, like the old Roman Republic, it will lose its democracy
to a domestic dictatorship.

On 3/14/07, Carrol Cox <cbcox@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> paul phillips wrote:
>
> Has anyone on pen-l read this?  If so, what reaction?

When someone treats the Roman Republic as though it were any more a
democracy than the Roman Empire, I began to wonder about the whole
analysis. The Roman Republic was (a) a tyranny and (b) every bit as
imperialist as the empire. Athens was a democracy. It was also
imperialist. The democracy survived until Alexander destroyed it from
outside.

The dominant culture of America used to seek to have Americans identify with the Athenians, who were democratic and imperialistic at the same time. But nowadays the dominant American culture wants to have Americans identify with oligarchic Spartans.

According to Lenin's Tomb (at
<http://leninology.blogspot.com/2007/03/gorgeous-slaughter.html>) and
other reviewers, (the just released and apparently wildly popular
film) 300 takes the Battle of Thermopylae and turns it into an epic
battle not only against the (naturally tyrannical) Persians but also
Blacks, queers, and so forth (you can watch two trailers of the film
at <http://www.apple.com/trailers/wb/300/> and see for yourself).

It is quite appropriate that a film about the Battle of Thermopylae,
which the Greeks lost, is being shown at a time when many Americans,
even a growing number of Republicans, are thinking that America
already lost or is soon to lose in Iraq (which was part of the Persian
Empire at the time of the Greco-Persian Wars:
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:World_500_BCE.png>).  The film
tells the Americans to sacrifice themselves bravely in Iraq, even to
the last man.  Their heroic deaths will be avenged later -- just as
Greek deaths were avenged first at the naval Battle of Salamis and
decisively at the Battle of Plataea.  Ominously, the second US
aircraft carrier group has already been deployed to the Persian Gulf.
--
Yoshie
<http://montages.blogspot.com/>
<http://mrzine.org>
<http://monthlyreview.org/>



Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]