don't you man the "ruling elite," not the "ruling class"?
how about G. William Domhoff? Tom Bottomore has a nice little book on _Elites and Society_, BTW. The original elite theories came from folks like Pareto and Mosca, who were pretty conservative.
A few months ago, when I told Bertell Ollman that I was working on a book about the ruling class, which I described as a hybrid of C. Wright Mills and Vanity Fair, Bertell looked pained, and asked, "Mills? No Marx?" I said Marx would always be there, but he didn't have much to say about the ruling class. I then asked him if there were any Marxist writers on the r.c. he liked. He replied, "No. They mostly think of it as self-evident."
-- Jim Devine / "The truth is more important than the facts." -- Frank Lloyd Wright
- Re: psychology & Marxism [was: Gambling for Empire], (continued)
- Re: psychology & Marxism [was: Gambling for Empire], Yahya Madra Mon 12 Mar 2007, 21:53 GMT
- Re: psychology & Marxism [was: Gambling for Empire], Yoshie Furuhashi Mon 12 Mar 2007, 22:09 GMT
- Re: psychology & Marxism [was: Gambling for Empire], Doug Henwood Mon 12 Mar 2007, 22:18 GMT
- Re: psychology & Marxism [was: Gambling for Empire], Yoshie Furuhashi Mon 12 Mar 2007, 22:29 GMT
- Re: psychology & Marxism [was: Gambling for Empire], Jim Devine Mon 12 Mar 2007, 22:54 GMT
- Re: psychology & Marxism [was: Gambling for Empire], Leigh Meyers Mon 12 Mar 2007, 23:18 GMT
- Re: psychology & Marxism [was: Gambling for Empire], knowknot Sat 17 Mar 2007, 23:25 GMT
- they FINALLY found those Iraqi WsMD!, Jim Devine Mon 12 Mar 2007, 20:09 GMT
- "Salvador strategy", Jim Devine Mon 12 Mar 2007, 19:48 GMT