PEN-L
mailing list archive

Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]

Date:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Thread:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Index:  [ Author  | Date  | Thread  ]

Re: psychology & Marxism [was: Gambling for Empire]



don't you man the "ruling elite," not the "ruling class"?

how about G. William Domhoff? Tom Bottomore has a nice little book on
_Elites and Society_, BTW. The original elite theories came from folks
like Pareto and Mosca, who were pretty conservative.

On 3/12/07, Doug Henwood <dhenwood@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
A few months ago, when I told Bertell Ollman that I was working on a
book about the ruling class, which I described as a hybrid of C.
Wright Mills and Vanity Fair, Bertell looked pained, and asked,
"Mills? No Marx?" I said Marx would always be there, but he didn't
have much to say about the ruling class. I then asked him if there
were any Marxist writers on the r.c. he liked. He replied, "No. They
mostly think of it as self-evident."

-- Jim Devine / "The truth is more important than the facts." -- Frank Lloyd Wright



Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]