PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Libby guilty of perjury
- To: PEN-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Libby guilty of perjury
- From: Eugene Coyle <eugenecoyle@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 20:12:19 -0800
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=igc.org; b=bIVYV38kUNRVQvxhJHlwZC5JjEAMpahZmfPxTxO+OnoqGXzMH1oEhZUiY6TaBQ0l; h=Received:In-Reply-To:References:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Message-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding:From:Subject:Date:To:X-Mailer:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
There were alternates but they had not been in the deliberations. So
they would not know what the others had discussed, hence everything
would have tostart over. At least that was the judge's statement.
On Mar 6, 2007, at 7:47 PM, Michael Perelman wrote:
No alternates were available?
--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929
Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail michael at ecst.csuchico.edu
michaelperelman.wordpress.com
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]