PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Libby guilty of perjury
- To: PEN-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Libby guilty of perjury
- From: Eugene Coyle <eugenecoyle@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 19:28:49 -0800
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=igc.org; b=S5lLHNJYD8pHN5pnyCp4jxEAP1Pmd+VI93UVfkvTQog2bjkdqmVHT/DYPeybdMoF; h=Received:In-Reply-To:References:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Message-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding:From:Subject:Date:To:X-Mailer:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
The judge asserted tht the 2 and a half days the jury had been
deliberating b efore the juror was dismissed would be wasted. The
new twelve would have to start over. I assume the judge knew it was
legal to go with 11.
The prosecutor argued for 12 and lost.
Gene
On Mar 6, 2007, at 6:33 PM, Michael Perelman wrote:
Why did the judge not add a 12 juror? Why could the trial proceed
with only 11
jurors?
--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929
Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail michael at ecst.csuchico.edu
michaelperelman.wordpress.com
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]