Politcal Pot - 'Doing Them' with their own laws

[Leigh Meyers <the.buffalo.in.the.midst@xxxxxxxxx>]

[JURIST] A group that advocates the therapeutic use of marijuana
<http://www.jurist.law.pitt.edu/jurist_search.php?q=marijuana> [JURIST
news archive] is suing the US Food and Drug Administration
<http://www.fda.gov> and the Department of Health and Human Services
<http://www.hhs.gov> [official websites] for their statements that the
drug has no medical value.

According to a complaint <http://www.safeaccessnow.org/> [PDF text]
filed Wednesday in US District Court in San Francisco, Americans for
Safe Access <http://www.safeaccessnow.org/> (ASA) [advocacy website]
alleges that the government's statements "deter sick and dying persons
from seeking to obtain medicine that could provide them with needed, and
often life-saving, relief."

ASA's lawsuit invokes the Data Quality Act
<http://www.fws.gov/informationquality/section515.html> (DQA) [text; OMB
materials
<http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/inforeg/agency_info_quality_links.html>;
ASA backgrounder
<http://www.safeaccessnow.org/article.php?list=type&type=160>], which
President Bush signed in 2001 to ensure "the quality, objectivity,
utility, and integrity of information" disseminated by federal agencies.
The statute allows citizens to seek correction of flawed information.
"The FDA position on medical cannabis is incorrect, dishonest and a
flagrant violation of laws requiring the government to base policy on
sound science," ASA chief counsel Joe Elford said in a press release
<http://www.safeaccessnow.org/article.php?id=4213> [text].

ASA asserts that scientific research, including a new study involving
AIDS patients <http://www.neurology.org/cgi/content/abstract/68/7/515>
[abstract] and a 1999 Institute of Medicine report
<http://www.nap.edu/readingroom/books/marimed/> [text], has shown that
marijuana is effective in treating some illnesses.

The lawsuit seeks a permanent injunction barring the agencies from
disseminating statements
<http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getpage.cgi?dbname=2001_register&position=all&page=20039>
[text] that marijuana "has no currently accepted medical use" and
ordering them to correct the statements. The New York Times has more
<http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/22/washington/22marijuana.html?ex=1329886800&en=6da7d1d31394f05d&ei=5124&partner=permalink&exprod=permalink>.
The San Francisco Chronicle has local coverage
<http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/02/22/BAGFMO8RE61.DTL>.

About a dozen US states permit the use of medical marijuana. Rhode
Island joined that list last year, when legislators overrode the
governor's veto
<http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/paperchase/2006/01/rhode-island-legalizes-medical.php>
[JURIST report] of a bill allowing patients to use marijuana under a
physician's supervision. However, the US Supreme Court's 2005 decision
in Gonzales v. Raich
<http://straylight.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/03-1454.ZS.html> [opinion
text; Duke Law case backgrounder
<http://www.law.duke.edu/publiclaw/supremecourtonline/certgrants/2004/ashvrai.html>]
validated Congress's power to criminalize the growth and personal use of
marijuana for medical purposes.

This report was prepared in partnership with the Pittsburgh Journal of
Environmental and Public Health Law <http://envirohealth.law.pitt.edu/>.