> implies, though I'm sure > that is not A.N.'s intention, that Marxism is a > religion
Certainly not a religion, but an ideology. I appreciate that PEN-L and lbo-talk are full of all sorts of critical, non-dogmatic people who apply the label Marxist to themselves. My question is: why? Isn't it confusing to then clarify why one is a Marxist despite not adhering to this or that aspect of Marxist orthodoxy?
For both better and worse, Marxists have been more like Protestants than Catholics, especially after the height of Stalinism. :-> You don't agree with the doctrine, you tinker with it here and there, you part company with the hierarchy, you start a new church, and then voila, countless Marxist denominations, just like countless Protestant denominations. -- Yoshie <http://montages.blogspot.com/> <http://mrzine.org> <http://monthlyreview.org/>
- Re: Welcoming Stan Goff Out of Marxism, (continued)
- Re: Welcoming Stan Goff Out of Marxism, Angelus Novus Sun 03 Dec 2006, 17:17 GMT
- Re: Welcoming Stan Goff Out of Marxism, Yoshie Furuhashi Sun 03 Dec 2006, 17:35 GMT
- Re: Welcoming Stan Goff Out of Marxism, Carrol Cox Sun 03 Dec 2006, 17:21 GMT
- Re: Welcoming Stan Goff Out of Marxism, Angelus Novus Sun 03 Dec 2006, 17:40 GMT
- Re: Welcoming Stan Goff Out of Marxism, Yoshie Furuhashi Sun 03 Dec 2006, 17:50 GMT
- Re: Welcoming Stan Goff Out of Marxism, Michael Perelman Sun 03 Dec 2006, 17:53 GMT
- Re: Welcoming Stan Goff Out of Marxism, Jim Devine Sun 03 Dec 2006, 17:54 GMT
- Re: Welcoming Stan Goff Out of Marxism, Jim Devine Sun 03 Dec 2006, 16:48 GMT
- Re: Welcoming Stan Goff Out of Marxism, Doug Henwood Sun 03 Dec 2006, 16:52 GMT