PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Stan Goff's statement
- To: PEN-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Stan Goff's statement
- From: Angelus Novus <fuerdenkommunismus@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 07:24:55 -0800
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=FozNmshORHMquh/onz8QoYdUcB3F4k3Bo3WILNK5eLIxK29fE/Khqt2EfWXzWS1R5Kte17LA1B3qzbvXyJoJi0/yMrv7V+idaOzSdfNAC6TUO0KJIGazbwynZ45uWVK3voEriJeRaSY1WNuEQ9fO+bKrPRDSid+f4pbn2c5wGe0=;
Carrol,
Sorry for the confusion. No, after the URL is an
argument I was trying to use _against_ Goff's
understanding of the "main contradiction."
In other words, I think the argument after the URL is
spot on: the contradictin Marx makes out is between
forces and relations of production, or as I would
prefer to phrase it, between abstract Value and
concrete material production.
Goff's use of the phrase "main contradiction" is a
dead giveaway. My advice to anyone would be to run
like hell from any alleged Marxist group using
terminology like "main contradiction."
--- Carrol Cox <cbcox@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Angelus Novus wrote:---
>
> Could you indicate a bit more clearly who is saying
> what in your post.
> Are all the words after the URL by Stan Goff?
>
> Carrol
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.
http://new.mail.yahoo.com
- Thread context:
- Re: Stan Goff's statement, (continued)
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]