Jim Devine wrote:
> It's hard to say using any kind of brevity. One shared characteristic > would having zero surplus-value.
Does "surplus-value" in the sense applicable to capitalism have meaning in an ideal community?
no it doesn't. Surplus-value is a category unique to capitalism. An ideal society might produce a surplus, though, as Marx noted in his CRITIQUE OF THE GOTHA PROGRAM.
-- Jim Devine / "Because things are the way they are, things will not stay the way they are." -- Bertolt Brecht
- Re: "Blindly operating averages" and price-value divergence, (continued)
- Re: "Blindly operating averages" and price-value divergence, Jim Devine Thu 30 Nov 2006, 16:47 GMT
- Re: "Blindly operating averages" and price-value divergence, Ted Winslow Thu 30 Nov 2006, 13:56 GMT
- Re: "Blindly operating averages" and price-value divergence, Jim Devine Thu 30 Nov 2006, 16:47 GMT
- Re: "Blindly operating averages" and price-value divergence, Ted Winslow Thu 30 Nov 2006, 17:15 GMT
- Re: "Blindly operating averages" and price-value divergence, Jim Devine Thu 30 Nov 2006, 17:36 GMT
- Re: "Blindly operating averages" and price-value divergence, Rogers Thu 30 Nov 2006, 22:57 GMT
- Re: "Blindly operating averages" and price-value divergence, Jim Devine Fri 01 Dec 2006, 18:07 GMT
- Re: "Blindly operating averages" and price-value divergence, Ted Winslow Fri 01 Dec 2006, 19:03 GMT